mm/page_alloc: harmonize should_compact_retry() type

Currently order is signed in one version of the function and unsigned in
the other. Tidy that up.

In page_alloc.c, order is unsigned in the vast majority of cases. But,
there is a cluster of exceptions in compaction-related code (probably
stemming from the fact that compact_control.order is signed). So, prefer
local consistency and make this one signed too.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250826-cleanup-should_compact_retry-v1-1-d2ca89727fcf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Author: bjackman

mm/page_alloc.c

@@ -4182,7 +4182,7 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 }
 
 static inline bool
-should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
+should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, int order, int alloc_flags,
 		     enum compact_result compact_result,
 		     enum compact_priority *compact_priority,
 		     int *compaction_retries)