Skip to content

fix(eda): avoid narrow event naming trigger - #59

Merged
yordis merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
yordis/fix-rename-eda-event-definition
May 26, 2026
Merged

fix(eda): avoid narrow event naming trigger#59
yordis merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
yordis/fix-rename-eda-event-definition

Conversation

@yordis

@yordis yordis commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • The EDA skill now covers event definition boundaries beyond event names, so the trigger needs to match the broader workflow.
  • Narrow skill metadata makes actor context, stream identity, and record-boundary questions easier to miss.

Signed-off-by: Yordis Prieto <yordis.prieto@gmail.com>
@cursor

cursor Bot commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Low Risk
Documentation and skill metadata only; no runtime or security-sensitive code changes.

Overview
Renames the trogonstack-eda skill from event-name to event-definition and aligns plugin, README, and reference copy with that broader scope.

Skill metadata and body now describe full event definitions—names, payload fields, event_type, stream boundaries, and metadata/context/payload separation—not naming alone. Triggers and “do not use” guidance are tightened so the skill is chosen for definition review/design rather than schema evolution, modeling workflows, or event-store implementation.

Wording shifts from “event names” to “event definitions” in headings, interview steps, and the core principle. Reference docs point at the event-definition skill instead of event-name.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 4028ee6. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@yordis, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 34 minutes and 53 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d140d182-c843-4385-8cca-0a4d5526a332

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df69a96 and 4028ee6.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • plugins/trogonstack-eda/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • plugins/trogonstack-eda/README.md
  • plugins/trogonstack-eda/skills/event-definition/SKILL.md
  • plugins/trogonstack-eda/skills/event-definition/references/event-naming-rules.md
  • plugins/trogonstack-eda/skills/event-definition/references/event-record-boundaries.md
  • plugins/trogonstack-eda/skills/event-definition/references/field-naming-rules.md
  • plugins/trogonstack-eda/skills/event-definition/references/quality-checklist.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch yordis/fix-rename-eda-event-definition

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@yordis
yordis merged commit 2ff15fa into main May 26, 2026
4 checks passed
@yordis
yordis deleted the yordis/fix-rename-eda-event-definition branch May 26, 2026 06:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant