Skip to content

Commit 56b3747

Browse files
authored
Update 16-09-19TPAC-1.md
1 parent d880919 commit 56b3747

File tree

1 file changed

+12
-10
lines changed

1 file changed

+12
-10
lines changed

meetings/16-09-19TPAC-1.md

Lines changed: 12 additions & 10 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -53,25 +53,27 @@ Dominic (Google): `<button>` produces something that is focusable and has an ARI
5353

5454
#### Feature requests for v2
5555

56+
- Support `/deep/` (`>>>`) in CSS Static profile
57+
- https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/78
58+
- Blink will implement this feature behind a flag to know whether this feature can be justified or not.
59+
We need feedback from web developers.
60+
61+
- {DocumentOrShadowRoot or Slot}.activePath
62+
- https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/479
63+
- It looks a reasonable proposal. Because `activeElement` does not meet developer's requirements.
64+
5665
If someone has a strong interest on any of the following features, please let us know that.
57-
It looks none of them is MUST-TO-DISCUSS topic.
66+
It looks none of them is MUST-TO-DISCUSS topic. It looks there is no strong interests on any of them.
5867

5968
- [Optional topic] Support Custom Pseudo-elements
6069
- https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/300
6170
- It looks there is no strong interests on this.
62-
- [Optional topic] {DocumentOrShadowRoot or Slot}.activePath
63-
- https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/479
64-
- It looks there is no strong interests on this.
6571
- [Optional topic] Declarative Shadow DOM
6672
- https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/71
6773
- There is no clear proposals. There is no strong interests. If someone has an interest, please add a comment on the issue.
68-
- [Optional topic] Support /deep/ in CSS Static profile
69-
- https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/78
70-
- Blink will implement this feature behind a flag to know whether this feature can be justified or not.
71-
We need feedback from web developers.
72-
- Imperative distribution (slotting) APIs
74+
- [Optional topic] Imperative distribution (slotting) APIs
7375
- https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/343
74-
- It looks we have lost an interest on this feature?
76+
- It looks we have lost an interest on this feature.
7577

7678
----
7779

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)