Support invalid receivers in the IBC PFM flow

[sug0]

Describe your changes

Based on #4082

In order to be compatible with the Osmosis XCS contracts, which set invalid tnam1... addresses, we must disable validation of receivers, while handling PFM packets.

Diff: https://github.com/anoma/namada/compare/bat+tiago/feat/ibc-pfm..bat+tiago/feat/ibc-pfm-with-invalid-addrs

Checklist before merging

• If this PR has some consensus breaking changes, I added the corresponding breaking:: labels
  • This will require 2 reviewers to approve the changes
• If this PR requires changes to the docs or specs, a corresponding PR is opened in the namada-docs repo
  • Relevant PR if applies:
• If this PR affects services such as namada-indexer or namada-masp-indexer, a corresponding PR is opened in that repo
  • Relevant PR if applies:

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.08230% with 194 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.53%. Comparing base (867e20d) to head (6e1a56e).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crates/ibc/src/context/middlewares/pfm_mod.rs	52.63%	180 Missing ⚠️
crates/ibc/src/context/token_transfer.rs	63.63%	8 Missing ⚠️
crates/ibc/src/context/nft_transfer_mod.rs	33.33%	2 Missing ⚠️
crates/ibc/src/context/transfer_mod.rs	33.33%	2 Missing ⚠️
crates/ibc/src/lib.rs	88.23%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4134      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.59%   74.53%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         342      344       +2     
  Lines      108796   109256     +460     
==========================================
+ Hits        81152    81433     +281     
- Misses      27644    27823     +179     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sug0]

(rebased on latest main)