Skip to content

Mv bloom size limit#81

Merged
matthewvon merged 8 commits intomasterfrom
mv-bloom-size-limit
Jun 17, 2013
Merged

Mv bloom size limit#81
matthewvon merged 8 commits intomasterfrom
mv-bloom-size-limit

Conversation

@matthewvon
Copy link
Contributor

@ghost ghost assigned matthewvon Jun 12, 2013
…mpaction ... now it is. This is to reduce disk corruption creating weird, random segfaults (and causing tech support calls).
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason not to just delete this code rather than leave it commented out? If there's a reason to keep it around, maybe the comment should make note of that.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Laziness. Will remove before push to master.

@gburd
Copy link

gburd commented Jun 17, 2013

After reviewing and testing the code in the small (on my laptop) and then discussing with MvM these new heuristics for compaction and which levels may contain overlapping sst files I feel that these changes will improve things as anticipated and I don't see any obvious drawbacks. +1 to merge

matthewvon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2013
@matthewvon matthewvon merged commit be0d467 into master Jun 17, 2013
@matthewvon matthewvon deleted the mv-bloom-size-limit branch May 5, 2016 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants