Skip to content

Fix %files section to not claim ownership of bindir and mandir#54

Merged
jaredmorrow merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
jem-rpm-files-directive
May 10, 2013
Merged

Fix %files section to not claim ownership of bindir and mandir#54
jaredmorrow merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
jem-rpm-files-directive

Conversation

@jaredmorrow
Copy link
Contributor

Addresses: #50 basho/riak_cs#554

The %files section had to general a case for both (s)bindir and mandir, specifying the actual directory rather than the contents of the directory. This change simply changes those
two lines to be the <dir>/* style as recommended in the fedora package maintainers documentation

Addresses: #50 basho/riak_cs#554

The %files section had to general a case for both (s)bindir
and mandir, specifying the actual directory rather than the
contents of the directory.  This change simply changes those
two lines to be the `<dir>/*` style as recommended in the
[fedora package maintainers documentation](http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25files_section)
@jaredmorrow
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tested on centos 5 and fedora 17 by package installation and running it through rpmlint. This is the proper behavior.

jaredmorrow added a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2013
Fix %files section to not claim ownership of bindir and mandir
@jaredmorrow jaredmorrow merged commit a9eed44 into master May 10, 2013
@jaredmorrow jaredmorrow deleted the jem-rpm-files-directive branch May 10, 2013 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant