Skip to content

Changes needed to expose FSM timeouts to clients#521

Merged
evanmcc merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
pevm-client-specified-timeouts
Apr 3, 2013
Merged

Changes needed to expose FSM timeouts to clients#521
evanmcc merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
pevm-client-specified-timeouts

Conversation

@evanmcc
Copy link
Contributor

@evanmcc evanmcc commented Mar 26, 2013

  • change delete in riak_client to honor timeouts passed
    in Options
  • change the various object interfaces to collect and
    pass on the timeout values

requires basho/riak_pb#38

  - change delete in riak_client to honor timeouts passed
    in Options
  - change the various object interfaces to collect and
    pass on the timeout values
@evanmcc
Copy link
Contributor Author

evanmcc commented Mar 26, 2013

associated riak test: basho/riak_test#243

@ghost ghost assigned evanmcc and seancribbs Mar 26, 2013
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be at debug level and probably have a more useful message.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

meant to remove.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you provide a bad timeout value, it doesn't actually use the default but returns a 400 response.

@seancribbs
Copy link
Contributor

I also wonder about the arbitrary 100ms being added to the timeout, which produces some strange results if you set the timeout very low. In a sense, you cannot set a timeout lower than 100ms.

@seancribbs
Copy link
Contributor

👍 to merge.

evanmcc added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2013
Changes needed to expose FSM timeouts to clients
@evanmcc evanmcc merged commit 3750a36 into master Apr 3, 2013
@seancribbs seancribbs deleted the pevm-client-specified-timeouts branch April 1, 2015 23:31
@seancribbs seancribbs removed their assignment May 8, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants