-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathautoregenerative_feedback.py
More file actions
83 lines (69 loc) · 4.32 KB
/
autoregenerative_feedback.py
File metadata and controls
83 lines (69 loc) · 4.32 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
def load_evaluation_summary(file_path="evaluation_summary.csv"):
"""Loads a summary of evaluation results."""
try:
return pd.read_csv(file_path)
except FileNotFoundError:
print(f"Error: Evaluation summary file not found at {file_path}")
return pd.DataFrame()
def provide_autoregenerative_feedback(evaluation_summary_df):
"""Provides conceptual autoregenerative feedback based on evaluation summary.
In a real system, this would involve analyzing trends and specific metrics
to suggest concrete adjustments to the model (e.g., fine-tuning parameters,
data augmentation strategies, prompt engineering adjustments).
"""
print("\n--- Autoregenerative Feedback System ---")
if evaluation_summary_df.empty:
print("No evaluation summary available to provide feedback.")
return {}
feedback_suggestions = {}
# Example: Analyze overall alignment score from psychometrics
if "overall_alignment" in evaluation_summary_df.columns:
avg_alignment = evaluation_summary_df["overall_alignment"].mean()
print(f"Average Human-AI Alignment: {avg_alignment:.2f}")
if avg_alignment < 0.7:
feedback_suggestions["alignment"] = "Consider refining model's value alignment or persona to improve human-AI integration. Focus on training data that reflects desired ethical and social norms."
else:
feedback_suggestions["alignment"] = "Human-AI alignment is generally good. Continue monitoring and fine-tuning for subtle improvements."
# Example: Analyze micro-level metrics (e.g., lexical richness)
if "lexical_richness_ttr" in evaluation_summary_df.columns:
avg_lexical_richness = evaluation_summary_df["lexical_richness_ttr"].mean()
print(f"Average Lexical Richness (TTR): {avg_lexical_richness:.2f}")
if avg_lexical_richness < 0.6:
feedback_suggestions["lexical_richness"] = "Model outputs show low lexical richness. Explore diverse training data or adjust decoding strategies (e.g., temperature, top-k sampling) to encourage more varied vocabulary."
else:
feedback_suggestions["lexical_richness"] = "Lexical richness is adequate. Maintain diversity in generated text."
# Example: Analyze macro-level sentiment polarity
if "sentiment_polarity" in evaluation_summary_df.columns:
avg_sentiment_polarity = evaluation_summary_df["sentiment_polarity"].mean()
print(f"Average Sentiment Polarity: {avg_sentiment_polarity:.2f}")
if avg_sentiment_polarity < -0.1:
feedback_suggestions["sentiment_bias"] = "Model outputs show a negative sentiment bias. Review training data for potential biases or implement sentiment-aware fine-tuning."
elif avg_sentiment_polarity > 0.1:
feedback_suggestions["sentiment_bias"] = "Model outputs show a positive sentiment bias. Ensure neutrality where appropriate."
else:
feedback_suggestions["sentiment_bias"] = "Sentiment polarity is balanced. Good."
# Example: Analyze benchmark results (e.g., BBQ bias score)
if "bbq_bias_score_race" in evaluation_summary_df.columns:
avg_bbq_bias = evaluation_summary_df["bbq_bias_score_race"].mean()
print(f"Average BBQ Bias Score (Race): {avg_bbq_bias:.2f}")
if avg_bbq_bias > 0.2:
feedback_suggestions["bias_mitigation"] = "High bias detected in BBQ benchmark. Prioritize bias mitigation techniques, such as debiasing datasets or adversarial training."
else:
feedback_suggestions["bias_mitigation"] = "Bias scores are acceptable. Continue monitoring."
print("\nFeedback Suggestions:")
for key, value in feedback_suggestions.items():
print(f" - {key.replace('_', ' ').title()}: {value}")
return feedback_suggestions
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Dummy evaluation summary (in a real scenario, this would be a consolidated result
# from all previous evaluation steps)
dummy_evaluation_summary = pd.DataFrame({
"overall_alignment": [0.65, 0.72, 0.68],
"lexical_richness_ttr": [0.55, 0.62, 0.58],
"sentiment_polarity": [-0.05, 0.02, -0.01],
"bbq_bias_score_race": [0.25, 0.18, 0.30],
"factual_accuracy": [0.8, 0.85, 0.79]
})
feedback = provide_autoregenerative_feedback(dummy_evaluation_summary)