Update apptesting:execute's yaml format#9898
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @lfkellogg, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the test configuration schema by renaming a key field. The change ensures consistency with new UX terminology, improving clarity and maintainability for defining test step assertions across the application and its test templates. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly renames successCriteria to finalScreenAssertion in the YAML-based app testing feature, updating the TestStep type, tests, and templates. The changes are consistent and align with the goal of matching the new UX.
I did notice that the old property name successCriteria is still used in what appears to be a separate, AI-driven testing feature within src/mcp/tools/apptesting/tests.ts and src/mcp/prompts/apptesting/run_test.ts. While these files are outside the scope of this PR, I recommend aligning the naming there as well in a future change to ensure consistency across all app testing functionalities. The changes in this PR are solid.
I'll do this in a followup. |
Description
Renames
successCriteriatofinalScreenAssertionto match new UX (b/483144211)Scenarios Tested
Updated and ran unit tests.
Sample Commands
No change