Skip to content

azurerm_netapp_pool - add support for cool_access_enabled#29468

Merged
mbfrahry merged 2 commits intomainfrom
f-netapp-cool-access
May 9, 2025
Merged

azurerm_netapp_pool - add support for cool_access_enabled#29468
mbfrahry merged 2 commits intomainfrom
f-netapp-cool-access

Conversation

@mbfrahry
Copy link
Member

@mbfrahry mbfrahry commented May 2, 2025

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevant documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_netapp_pool - add support for cool_access_enabled [GH-00000]

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #0000

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

Copy link
Collaborator

@sreallymatt sreallymatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @mbfrahry, I left some minor comments inline

@@ -84,9 +89,12 @@ func dataSourceNetAppPoolRead(d *pluginsdk.ResourceData, meta interface{}) error

if model := resp.Model; model != nil {
d.Set("location", location.NormalizeNilable(&model.Location))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While it didn't change in this PR, should we change this to location.Normalize rather than passing the address of location?

Suggested change
d.Set("location", location.NormalizeNilable(&model.Location))
d.Set("location", location.Normalize(model.Location))

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good shout!


* `encryption_type` - The encryption type of the pool.

* `cool_access_enabled` - Can the pool hold cool access enabled volumes?
Copy link
Collaborator

@sreallymatt sreallymatt May 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we structure these as statements rather than questions?

Suggested change
* `cool_access_enabled` - Can the pool hold cool access enabled volumes?
* `cool_access_enabled` - Whether the NetApp Pool can hold cool access enabled volumes.


* `encryption_type` - (Optional) The encryption type of the pool. Valid values include `Single`, and `Double`. Defaults to `Single`. Changing this forces a new resource to be created.

* `cool_access_enabled` - (Optional) Can the pool hold cool access enabled volumes? Defaults to `false`.
Copy link
Collaborator

@sreallymatt sreallymatt May 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* `cool_access_enabled` - (Optional) Can the pool hold cool access enabled volumes? Defaults to `false`.
* `cool_access_enabled` - (Optional) Whether the NetApp Pool can hold cool access enabled volumes. Defaults to `false`.

Copy link
Collaborator

@sreallymatt sreallymatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @mbfrahry, LGTM!

@mbfrahry mbfrahry merged commit bbdf61f into main May 9, 2025
33 checks passed
@mbfrahry mbfrahry deleted the f-netapp-cool-access branch May 9, 2025 22:59
@mbfrahry mbfrahry added this to the v4.29.0 milestone May 9, 2025
mbfrahry added a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2025
jackofallops added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2025
* CHANGELOG.md for v4.29.0

* Update CHANGELOG.md #29042

* Update CHANGELOG.md #29492

* Update CHANGELOG.md #28953

* Update CHANGELOG.md for #29468

* Update CHANGELOG.md #29519

* Update CHANGELOG.md #29536

* Update CHANGELOG.md #29524

* Update CHANGELOG.md

* Update CHANGELOG.md for #28193

* Update CHANGELOG.md #29239

* Update CHANGELOG.md #29614

* Update CHANGELOG.md #29601

* prep for release

* Update CHANGELOG.md

---------

Co-authored-by: sreallymatt <106555974+sreallymatt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Frahry <mbfrahry@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: jackofallops <11830746+jackofallops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jackofallops <ste@hashicorp.com>
gerrytan pushed a commit to gerrytan/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
* CHANGELOG.md for v4.29.0

* Update CHANGELOG.md hashicorp#29042

* Update CHANGELOG.md hashicorp#29492

* Update CHANGELOG.md hashicorp#28953

* Update CHANGELOG.md for hashicorp#29468

* Update CHANGELOG.md hashicorp#29519

* Update CHANGELOG.md hashicorp#29536

* Update CHANGELOG.md hashicorp#29524

* Update CHANGELOG.md

* Update CHANGELOG.md for hashicorp#28193

* Update CHANGELOG.md hashicorp#29239

* Update CHANGELOG.md hashicorp#29614

* Update CHANGELOG.md hashicorp#29601

* prep for release

* Update CHANGELOG.md

---------

Co-authored-by: sreallymatt <106555974+sreallymatt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Frahry <mbfrahry@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: jackofallops <11830746+jackofallops@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jackofallops <ste@hashicorp.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2025

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 9, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants