Skip to content

azurerm_dev_center_project_pool - support new property for single_sign_on_enabled#30440

Merged
sreallymatt merged 4 commits intohashicorp:mainfrom
neil-yechenwei:singleSignOnStatus
Aug 29, 2025
Merged

azurerm_dev_center_project_pool - support new property for single_sign_on_enabled#30440
sreallymatt merged 4 commits intohashicorp:mainfrom
neil-yechenwei:singleSignOnStatus

Conversation

@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor

@neil-yechenwei neil-yechenwei commented Aug 20, 2025

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

This PR is to support new property SingleSignOnStatus.

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevant documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Note: The failed test cases also failed on Teamcity Daily Run due to quota issue so that they are not related with this PR.
image

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_dev_center_project_pool - support new property for single_sign_on_enabled

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #30410

Rollback Plan

If a change needs to be reverted, we will publish an updated version of the provider.

Changes to Security Controls

Are there any changes to security controls (access controls, encryption, logging) in this pull request? If so, explain.

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/XS and removed size/S labels Aug 20, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@sreallymatt sreallymatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @neil-yechenwei, couple minor comments, could you add this to the data source as well to keep the resource and data source in sync?


"single_sign_on_enabled": {
Type: pluginsdk.TypeBool,
Optional: true,
Copy link
Collaborator

@sreallymatt sreallymatt Aug 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it make sense to give this a default of false given that's what's happening in the code? (i.e. Disabled by default)

Functionally it doesn't make a difference, but makes it easier to tell what the default is by glancing at the schema

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

Comment on lines +168 to +172
if model.SingleSignOnEnabled {
parameters.Properties.SingleSignOnStatus = pointer.To(pools.SingleSignOnStatusEnabled)
} else {
parameters.Properties.SingleSignOnStatus = pointer.To(pools.SingleSignOnStatusDisabled)
}
Copy link
Collaborator

@sreallymatt sreallymatt Aug 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For consistency, usually we simply set the default then conditionally update it rather than including an else statement

Suggested change
if model.SingleSignOnEnabled {
parameters.Properties.SingleSignOnStatus = pointer.To(pools.SingleSignOnStatusEnabled)
} else {
parameters.Properties.SingleSignOnStatus = pointer.To(pools.SingleSignOnStatusDisabled)
}
parameters.Properties.SingleSignOnStatus = pointer.To(pools.SingleSignOnStatusDisabled)
if model.SingleSignOnEnabled {
parameters.Properties.SingleSignOnStatus = pointer.To(pools.SingleSignOnStatusEnabled)
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

Comment on lines +273 to +277
if model.SingleSignOnEnabled {
parameters.Properties.SingleSignOnStatus = pointer.To(pools.SingleSignOnStatusEnabled)
} else {
parameters.Properties.SingleSignOnStatus = pointer.To(pools.SingleSignOnStatusDisabled)
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as above

Suggested change
if model.SingleSignOnEnabled {
parameters.Properties.SingleSignOnStatus = pointer.To(pools.SingleSignOnStatusEnabled)
} else {
parameters.Properties.SingleSignOnStatus = pointer.To(pools.SingleSignOnStatusDisabled)
}
parameters.Properties.SingleSignOnStatus = pointer.To(pools.SingleSignOnStatusDisabled)
if model.SingleSignOnEnabled {
parameters.Properties.SingleSignOnStatus = pointer.To(pools.SingleSignOnStatusEnabled)
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sreallymatt , thanks for the comments. I updated PR. Please take another look.

Copy link
Collaborator

@sreallymatt sreallymatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @neil-yechenwei LGTM ✅

@sreallymatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Test results:

--- PASS: TestAccDevCenterProjectPoolDataSource_basic (2093.65s)
--- PASS: TestAccDevCenterProjectPool_requiresImport (2100.37s)
--- PASS: TestAccDevCenterProjectPool_basic (2104.63s)
--- PASS: TestAccDevCenterProjectPool_complete (2107.60s)
--- PASS: TestAccDevCenterProjectPool_managedNetwork (2283.54s)
--- PASS: TestAccDevCenterProjectPool_update (2293.45s)

@sreallymatt sreallymatt merged commit 1e3079c into hashicorp:main Aug 29, 2025
36 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v4.43.0 milestone Aug 29, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 29, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for SSO (Single Sign On) with azurerm_dev_center_project_pool

2 participants