azurerm_search_service - implement plan time error when local_authentication_enabled = false and authentication_failure_mode is set#30882
Merged
mbfrahry merged 3 commits intohashicorp:mainfrom Oct 20, 2025
Conversation
mbfrahry
requested changes
Oct 17, 2025
Member
mbfrahry
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @djryanj, thanks for getting this customize diff in! It looks good but we can also do a little more cleanup by removing that check in the create. We'll never hit it with the customizeDiff in place so we can get it outta there
Contributor
Author
Contributor
Author
|
I answered my own question by removing that extraneous check in the update code and adding a test step to validate. Test output: make acctests SERVICE='search' TESTARGS='-run=TestAccSearchService_apiAccessControlUpdate' TESTTIMEOUT='60m'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
==> Checking that Custom Timeouts are used...
==> Checking that acceptance test packages are used...
TF_ACC=1 go test -v ./internal/services/search -run=TestAccSearchService_apiAccessControlUpdate -timeout 60m -ldflags="-X=github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/version.ProviderVersion=acc"
=== RUN TestAccSearchService_apiAccessControlUpdate
=== PAUSE TestAccSearchService_apiAccessControlUpdate
=== CONT TestAccSearchService_apiAccessControlUpdate
--- PASS: TestAccSearchService_apiAccessControlUpdate (820.87s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/search 820.918s |
Contributor
|
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Community Note
Description
In #30871 it was identified that an improvement to the plan time error checking when
local_authentication_enabled = falseandauthentication_failure_modeis set could be implemented. This PR implements that check.PR Checklist
For example: “
resource_name_here- description of change e.g. adding propertynew_property_name_here”Closes #30880
Testing
No new tests required. Running existing tests shows a dramatic change in test run time for the case where the error would be seen (which is expected).
Relevant test output before change:
After the change:
Testing the non-error case:
Change Log
Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.
azurerm_search_service- implement plan time error whenlocal_authentication_enabled = falseandauthentication_failure_modeis set [Improved validation of theazurerm_search_serviceschema #30880]This is a (please select all that apply):
Related Issue(s)
Fixes #30880
AI Assistance Disclosure
Rollback Plan
If a change needs to be reverted, we will publish an updated version of the provider.
Changes to Security Controls
Are there any changes to security controls (access controls, encryption, logging) in this pull request? If so, explain.
Note
If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.