Update aws-sdk-rust monorepo

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change	Pending
aws-config	workspace.dependencies	patch	1.8.16 → 1.8.17	1.8.18
aws-sdk-s3	workspace.dependencies	minor	1.131.0 → 1.133.0	1.135.0 (+1)
aws-types	workspace.dependencies	patch	1.3.15 → 1.3.16

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 3, 2026 9:31pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 3, 2026 9:31pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 3, 2026 9:31pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Routine dependency bumps, but they affect AWS config/credentials and S3 client code paths (e.g. hash-repo-chores); regressions would show up in CI or S3-related tooling rather than from edited app logic in this PR.

Overview
Renovate bumps the AWS SDK for Rust stack via Cargo.lock only—no workspace manifest or application source changes in this diff.

aws-config moves 1.8.16 → 1.8.17, aws-sdk-s3 1.131.0 → 1.133.0, and aws-types 1.3.15 → 1.3.16, with matching patch updates across aws-runtime, aws-sigv4, SSO/STS clients, and Smithy runtime/types/json/checksums. The lockfile also picks up new transitive crates (arc-swap, aws-smithy-schema) wired into config and several Smithy packages.

Unrelated lockfile churn: colored and winapi-util now depend on windows-sys 0.48.0 instead of 0.52.0.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit aa65861. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust AWS SDK crate aws-sdk-s3 from 1.131.0 to 1.132.0 (Renovate dependency bump).

Changes: Regenerates Cargo.lock to reflect the new resolved dependency set; no application source changes are included in this PR.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing deps/rs/aws-sdk-rust-monorepo (aa65861) with main (1802edd)}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.08%. Comparing base (1802edd) to head (aa65861).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8747      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.09%   59.08%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1343     1343              
  Lines      129731   129731              
  Branches     5866     5866              
==========================================
- Hits        76663    76652      -11     
- Misses      52167    52176       +9     
- Partials      901      903       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	2.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.19% <ø> (-0.18%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.74% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.26% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	79.28% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	75.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	86.94% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.06% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.293 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.682 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.744 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.071 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.874 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.022 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.565 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.543 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.820 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.929 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.368 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.410 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.977 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.226 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.575 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.322 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.093 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.594 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.611 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.052 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.320 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.579 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$54.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 520 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.019 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$46.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.633 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$50.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.309 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.968 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$62.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 314 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$62.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 513 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.386 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$56.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.595 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 568 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$46.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 218 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.865 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$278 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.09 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-16.683 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.915 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.929 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.690 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.947 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.115 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.735 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$27.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$36.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 348 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.050 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$36.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 388 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.248 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$36.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.774 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 362 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.524 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$35.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 400 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.649 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$35.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$36.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$94.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 527 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 702 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.634 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 645 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 538 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 613 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 781 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.737 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 545 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.979 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 841 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.426 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 613 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.532 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 578 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 733 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.631 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 578 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.625 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$188 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.72 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}29.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$155 \mathrm{ms} \pm 787 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$41.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.198 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$570 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.28 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph