[LA-35267] Doc team extId on /api/v1/users#39
Merged
Conversation
pajw
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Jira
LA-35267
What
Documents the new team-by-
integrationExternalIdparams on the public Grape v1 Users API, added in learnamp/learnamp#22631.primaryTeamIntegrationExternalId(String) — mutually exclusive withprimaryTeamId.secondaryTeamIntegrationExternalIds(Array[String]) — mutually exclusive withsecondaryTeamIds.POST /api/v1/users:must match existing teams integration external IDsfrom the newCompanyTeamExternalIdvalidator.mutually_exclusiveerror when both id-keyed and extId-keyed team params are sent together.Why
Companion to LA-35266 (api-docs#38) which documented
integrationExternalIdon the Teams API. Third-party integrations shouldn't need the LA-internalteam.idwhen provisioning users either.