From 4dbcae5da8de6dbd32b395104760e6de5dea8fda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Asya Kamsky Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:12:35 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fail to prevent reads as the opposite of what we're saying --- source/includes/fact-command-puts-secondary-into-recovering.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source/includes/fact-command-puts-secondary-into-recovering.rst b/source/includes/fact-command-puts-secondary-into-recovering.rst index 2375f96da0f..19ce9b8cde7 100644 --- a/source/includes/fact-command-puts-secondary-into-recovering.rst +++ b/source/includes/fact-command-puts-secondary-into-recovering.rst @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ - On secondaries, the |cmd-name| command forces the secondary to enter :replstate:`RECOVERING` state. Read operations issued to an instance in the :replstate:`RECOVERING` - state will fail to prevent clients from reading during the + state will fail. This prevents clients from reading during the operation. When the operation completes, the secondary returns to:replstate:`SECONDARY` state.