Conversation
|
@Trott ... is this flakiness due to recent changes or would this need to be marked in LTS also? |
|
@jasnell This should apply to LTS as well. |
|
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/1360/ /cc @nodejs/testing (looking for an |
|
LGTM
|
|
LGTM 😢 |
|
LGTM |
PR-URL: nodejs#4809 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Ref: nodejs#4427
|
Landed in c6d29cb |
PR-URL: nodejs#4809 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Ref: nodejs#4427
|
@Trott .. I marked this lts-watch for v4.. can you confirm that tho? Not sure when this went flaky |
|
@jasnell I ran a stress test against the v4.x branch and the test is flaky there, so yes, confirmed. https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-stress-single-test/377/nodes=win2008r2/console |
PR-URL: nodejs#4809 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Ref: nodejs#4427
Ref: #4427
Recent sample failures: