Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
lib/net.js
Outdated
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Perhaps switch to function(...args) { here?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I haven't ran the relevant benchmarks recently (at least with v8 5.1), but I wouldn't be surprised if rest args are still slower.
Member
|
LGTM |
2 similar comments
Contributor
|
LGTM |
Member
|
LGTM |
Contributor
Author
|
CI again before landing: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/3800/ |
mscdex
force-pushed
the
net-connect-args-add-check
branch
from
4173297 to
2c0d094
Compare
V8 is smart enough to optimize the length property checking when iterating over an array with a for loop. PR-URL: nodejs#8112 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This helps to prevent possible deoptimizations that arise when trying to access nonexistent indices. PR-URL: nodejs#8112 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
mscdex
force-pushed
the
net-connect-args-add-check
branch
from
2c0d094 to
a206afe
Compare
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2016
V8 is smart enough to optimize the length property checking when iterating over an array with a for loop. PR-URL: #8112 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2016
This helps to prevent possible deoptimizations that arise when trying to access nonexistent indices. PR-URL: #8112 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Contributor
|
should this be backported? |
Contributor
Author
|
I would say it's safe to backport. |
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2016
V8 is smart enough to optimize the length property checking when iterating over an array with a for loop. PR-URL: #8112 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2016
This helps to prevent possible deoptimizations that arise when trying to access nonexistent indices. PR-URL: #8112 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2016
V8 is smart enough to optimize the length property checking when iterating over an array with a for loop. PR-URL: #8112 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2016
This helps to prevent possible deoptimizations that arise when trying to access nonexistent indices. PR-URL: #8112 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2016
V8 is smart enough to optimize the length property checking when iterating over an array with a for loop. PR-URL: #8112 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2016
This helps to prevent possible deoptimizations that arise when trying to access nonexistent indices. PR-URL: #8112 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
Description of change