@@ -765,8 +765,59 @@ the more significant byte last.
765765
766766.. opcode :: BUILD_MAP (count)
767767
768- Pushes a new dictionary object onto the stack. The dictionary is pre-sized
769- to hold *count * entries.
768+ Pushes a new dictionary object onto the stack. Pops ``2 * count `` items
769+ so that the dictionary holds *count * entries:
770+ ``{..., TOS3: TOS2, TOS1: TOS} ``.
771+
772+ .. versionchanged :: 3.5
773+ The dictionary is created from stack items instead of creating an
774+ empty dictionary pre-sized to hold *count * items.
775+
776+
777+ .. opcode :: BUILD_TUPLE_UNPACK (count)
778+
779+ Pops *count * iterables from the stack, joins them in a single tuple,
780+ and pushes the result. Implements iterable unpacking in tuple
781+ displays ``(*x, *y, *z) ``.
782+
783+ .. versionadded :: 3.5
784+
785+
786+ .. opcode :: BUILD_LIST_UNPACK (count)
787+
788+ This is similar to :opcode: `BUILD_TUPLE_UNPACK `, but pushes a list
789+ instead of tuple. Implements iterable unpacking in list
790+ displays ``[*x, *y, *z] ``.
791+
792+ .. versionadded :: 3.5
793+
794+
795+ .. opcode :: BUILD_SET_UNPACK (count)
796+
797+ This is similar to :opcode: `BUILD_TUPLE_UNPACK `, but pushes a set
798+ instead of tuple. Implements iterable unpacking in set
799+ displays ``{*x, *y, *z} ``.
800+
801+ .. versionadded :: 3.5
802+
803+
804+ .. opcode :: BUILD_MAP_UNPACK (count)
805+
806+ Pops *count * mappings from the stack, merges them into a single dictionary,
807+ and pushes the result. Implements dictionary unpacking in dictionary
808+ displays ``{**x, **y, **z} ``.
809+
810+ .. versionadded :: 3.5
811+
812+
813+ .. opcode :: BUILD_MAP_UNPACK_WITH_CALL (oparg)
814+
815+ This is similar to :opcode: `BUILD_MAP_UNPACK `,
816+ but is used for ``f(**x, **y, **z) `` call syntax. The lowest byte of
817+ *oparg * is the count of mappings, the relative position of the
818+ corresponding callable ``f `` is encoded in the second byte of *oparg *.
819+
820+ .. versionadded :: 3.5
770821
771822
772823.. opcode :: LOAD_ATTR (namei)
0 commit comments