Skip to content

issues Search Results · repo:tc39/proposal-template-literal-revision language:HTML

Filter by

8 results
 (75 ms)

8 results

intc39/proposal-template-literal-revision (press backspace or delete to remove)

tc39/proposal-template-literal-revision
Is that proposal still work?

Recently, I have found that this proposal has reached stage 4, but I found that most browsers does not still lift such a template literal restriction, and I want to know is the proposal still work?
  • aleen42
  • 4
  • Opened 
    on Jul 15, 2019
  • #11

tc39/proposal-template-literal-revision
String.rawer for RegExp

The raw in my opinion was much needed so thank you that this reached stage 4. Could we take this one step further add maybe introduce String.rawer for times you want to use ${ and bakcticks in RegExps? ...
  • 7fe
  • 1
  • Opened 
    on Mar 6, 2018
  • #10

tc39/proposal-template-literal-revision
Stage 4?

This is stage 4, right? https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/finished-proposals.md says it s included in the latest draft at https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/, but that doesn t appear to be the ...
  • mroch
  • 2
  • Opened 
    on Aug 2, 2017
  • #6

tc39/proposal-template-literal-revision
Implementations

To reach stage 4, this needs at least two implementations. - [x] v8 - issue (currently behind a flag) - [x] SpiderMonkey - issue - [x] JavaScriptCore - issue - [ ] ChakraCore - issue - [x] Bonus: ...
  • bakkot
  • Opened 
    on Jan 8, 2017
  • #5

tc39/proposal-template-literal-revision
Production parameter "Tagged"

I’m curious to know more about the choice to introduce the Tagged syntactic production parameter. Existing parameterized productions are shorthand for 2 or more permutations that end up being meaningfully ...
  • bathos
  • Opened 
    on Oct 9, 2016
  • #4

tc39/proposal-template-literal-revision
Raw tagged template literals considered harmful

While I agree that the early errors are surprising, this proposal doesn t actually fix the problem - at best, it improves a few cases, while still leaving plenty of problematic and still-surprising scenarios. ...
  • shicks
  • 13
  • Opened 
    on Aug 8, 2016
  • #3

tc39/proposal-template-literal-revision
What's the status of this proposal?

This is a good one, but I can t find the which stage this currently in anywhere
  • lin7sh
  • 1
  • Opened 
    on Aug 8, 2016
  • #2

tc39/proposal-template-literal-revision
presumably only for tagged template literals??

I assume the intent is that the syntax error suppression would only be for tagged TemplateLiterals. The undefined approach seems plausible for it, but \unicode in an untagged TemplateLiteral should still ...
  • allenwb
  • Opened 
    on Mar 23, 2016
  • #1
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Restrict your search to the title by using the in:title qualifier.
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Restrict your search to the title by using the in:title qualifier.