Fix issue where app.js files are appended to tests.js#347
Merged
stefanpenner merged 1 commit intoember-cli:masterfrom Apr 13, 2014
Merged
Fix issue where app.js files are appended to tests.js#347stefanpenner merged 1 commit intoember-cli:masterfrom
stefanpenner merged 1 commit intoember-cli:masterfrom
Conversation
Member
|
👍 This was causing Ember and Ember Data to be loaded in the |
Contributor
|
make sure to add an entry to CHANGELOG |
stefanpenner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2014
Fix issue where app.js files are appended to tests.js
stefanpenner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2014
homu
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2016
…hammond Update supertest to version 2.0.0 🚀 Hello lovely humans, [supertest](https://www.npmjs.com/package/supertest) just published its new version 2.0.0. <table> <tr> <th align=left> State </th> <td> Update 🚀 </td> </tr> <tr> <th align=left> Dependency </td> <td> supertest </td> </tr> <tr> <th align=left> New version </td> <td> 2.0.0 </td> </tr> <tr> <th align=left> Type </td> <td> devDependency </td> </tr> </table> This version is **not covered** by your **current version range**. Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though. I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of supertest. Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update. Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right? Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work? There is a collection of [frequently asked questions](https://greenkeeper.io/faq.html) and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. [Let them know](https://github.com/greenkeeperio/greenkeeper/issues/new). Good luck with your project ✨ You rock! 🌴 --- [GitHub Release](https://github.com/visionmedia/supertest/releases/tag/v2.0.0) <p>PR-347 - Update to superagent ^2.0.0 (thanks <a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/saintedlama" class="user-mention">@saintedlama</a>)</p> --- The new version differs by 12 commits . - [`054ad57`](forwardemail/supertest@054ad57) <code>Prepare for 2.0.0 release.</code> - [`7ca0574`](forwardemail/supertest@7ca0574) <code>Upgrade superagent to 2.x (#347)</code> - [`7d35f22`](forwardemail/supertest@7d35f22) <code>Change 'super-agent' to 'superagent' in Readme. (#343)</code> - [`d0c1457`](forwardemail/supertest@d0c1457) <code>Fix eslint checks .pem (#331)</code> - [`076ce21`](forwardemail/supertest@076ce21) <code>Fix typo on line 74 (#330)</code> - [`a920af5`](forwardemail/supertest@a920af5) <code>MISC Update dev deps, small updates to README.</code> - [`25665c0`](forwardemail/supertest@25665c0) <code>Fix readme for .expect(fn), fixes #253 (#262)</code> - [`480b9bb`](forwardemail/supertest@480b9bb) <code>Merge pull request #324 from visionmedia/eslint-refactor</code> - [`af3c013`](forwardemail/supertest@af3c013) <code>Slight cleanup to esline rules. Remove some overrides, refactor logic in _assertHeader function.</code> - [`1849094`](forwardemail/supertest@1849094) <code>Refactor source code to use eslint with airbnb legacy rules.</code> - [`ecced93`](forwardemail/supertest@ecced93) <code>Merge pull request #318 from oskarcieslik/patch-1</code> - [`a1533e5`](forwardemail/supertest@a1533e5) <code>Changed example with cookie-parser</code> See the [full diff](forwardemail/supertest@f4efb75...054ad57). --- This pull request was created by [greenkeeper.io](https://greenkeeper.io/). <sub>Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ `greenkeeper upgrade`</sub>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.