Adds ic-ajax to ignored modules#378
Merged
stefanpenner merged 1 commit intoember-cli:masterfrom Apr 16, 2014
twokul:ic-ajax
Merged
Adds ic-ajax to ignored modules#378stefanpenner merged 1 commit intoember-cli:masterfrom twokul:ic-ajax
stefanpenner merged 1 commit intoember-cli:masterfrom
twokul:ic-ajax
Conversation
Member
|
CHANGELOG.md update? |
Member
|
Background for others, this allows you to import |
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
Contributor
|
I think it would be more sensible to:
Better than playing Whac-A-Mole :) |
Member
|
@MajorBreakfast - In general I agree, but in the meantime whack-a-mole has relatively low cost and the benefit of helping new-comers until we can figure out the best way forward. I think the better solution would be to modify broccoli-es6-concatenator to make the actual "found modules" listing available. This would allow us to fix #334 as well. |
Contributor
|
merging for now, with near future plans to follow what señor @MajorBreakfast outlined. |
stefanpenner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2014
Adds ic-ajax to ignored modules
homu
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2017
Update fs-extra to the latest version 🚀 ## Version **2.1.0** of [fs-extra](https://github.com/jprichardson/node-fs-extra) just got published. <table> <tr> <th align=left> Dependency </td> <td> fs-extra </td> </tr> <tr> <th align=left> Current Version </td> <td> 2.0.0 </td> </tr> <tr> <th align=left> Type </td> <td> dependency </td> </tr> </table> The version **2.1.0** is **not covered** by your **current version range**. Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though. I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of fs-extra. Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update. --- <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <p>The new version differs by 87 commits .</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/90b3609b894b27ff9ccd1f820c9a2eb44314f809"><code>90b3609</code></a> <code>2.1.0</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/6ebcb9cc287997c7390482a657d230c47a1e5743"><code>6ebcb9c</code></a> <code>Update CHANGELOG</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/efe0d80be465a6f5cbbbe41e95c091dad90c4ab0"><code>efe0d80</code></a> <code>Merge pull request #378 from jdalton/move-check</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/8d978db84dd7e236f6d34b740cb641d823480be5"><code>8d978db</code></a> <code>Don't move when source and dest paths are the same.</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/cf2c50d1f31ecfa0e07ead42bb60f05c5bdeadf9"><code>cf2c50d</code></a> <code>Merge pull request #386 from jprichardson/changelog</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/4db96c553cff3a35881eb13b09a0b4b54c2e3ac4"><code>4db96c5</code></a> <code>Update CHANGELOG</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/1f301611d1ce148210489aa715c1e05605d62956"><code>1f30161</code></a> <code>Merge pull request #384 from jprichardson/docs-cleanup-async-methods</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/83a61908906d018830def2b2c408471ec746f809"><code>83a6190</code></a> <code>docs: Refactor remove exmaple to use remove instead of removeSync</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/936011e253a0c8605f1a4a858e170226d6f46b80"><code>936011e</code></a> <code>docs: Refactor remove and removeSync parameter name</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/fc5fca9be1fdcc0ab6d69d5aa50dd0118f950ecc"><code>fc5fca9</code></a> <code>docs: Refactor docs to include parameters type</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/e46b820dc5da6418afe184ed2c1b756ab09946f7"><code>e46b820</code></a> <code>Merge pull request #383 from jprichardson/docs-refactor-readJson-example</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/a4f6481ebf67a6327f381426a26b3b27677e0589"><code>a4f6481</code></a> <code>docs/readJson.md: Refactor example for readJson method, refactor move and moveSync tests descriptions</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/b5c72dcf7bbad3dd4ef3b1268721de0fd3ec9575"><code>b5c72dc</code></a> <code>Merge pull request #382 from jprichardson/docs-split-out-sync-methods</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/10756de4df113704d921789a64a72aed06998272"><code>10756de</code></a> <code>docs: Refactor readJsonSync example</code></li> <li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/commit/02c2a629b8dee9e11cb6ce8e5b18f1f8ff4742e4"><code>02c2a62</code></a> <code>Docs: Split out sync methods</code></li> </ul> <p>There are 87 commits in total. See the <a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/compare/fcfa595ca022011ce0f61d337598a4573fe8eb3c...90b3609b894b27ff9ccd1f820c9a2eb44314f809">full diff</a>.</p> </details> <details> <summary>Not sure how things should work exactly?</summary> There is a collection of [frequently asked questions](https://greenkeeper.io/faq.html) and of course you may always [ask my humans](https://github.com/greenkeeperio/greenkeeper/issues/new). </details> --- Your [Greenkeeper](https://greenkeeper.io) Bot 🌴
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.