-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Align WireMockContainer constructor with the Testcontainers certification requirements + Verify image and version compatibility in the constructor #58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
513941d
Align WireMockContainer constructor with the Testcontainers certifica…
oleg-nenashev 1b446e2
Rename the variables to be more explicit
oleg-nenashev fb83f4a
Verify image compatibility in the initializer
oleg-nenashev d6f4ccf
Add test for Old Unsupported Version
oleg-nenashev fa22da1
Update documentation, note compatibility
oleg-nenashev 3132211
Apply suggestions from review
oleg-nenashev File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
76 changes: 76 additions & 0 deletions
76
src/test/java/org/wiremock/integrations/testcontainers/WireMockContainerUnitTest.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ | ||
| package org.wiremock.integrations.testcontainers; | ||
|
|
||
| import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions; | ||
| import org.junit.jupiter.api.Disabled; | ||
| import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; | ||
| import org.testcontainers.utility.DockerImageName; | ||
|
|
||
| import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat; | ||
|
|
||
| public class WireMockContainerUnitTest { | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| public void shouldInitWithDefault() { | ||
| WireMockContainer container = new WireMockContainer(WireMockContainer.WIREMOCK_2_LATEST); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| public void shouldInitWithHigherCompatibleVersion() { | ||
| WireMockContainer container = new WireMockContainer( | ||
| new DockerImageName(WireMockContainer.OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME, "2.100.0") | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| public void shouldFailForOlderImage() { | ||
| IllegalArgumentException ex = Assertions.assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> { | ||
| WireMockContainer container = new WireMockContainer( | ||
| new DockerImageName(WireMockContainer.OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME, "1.239.0")); | ||
| }); | ||
| assertThat(ex.getMessage()) | ||
| .as("Wrong exception message") | ||
| .contains("For the official image, the WireMock version must be >= " + WireMockContainer.WIREMOCK_2_MINIMUM_SUPPORTED_VERSION); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| public void shouldInitWithVersionedTestImagesWithSubstitution() { | ||
| // TODO: Should it be accepted by default | ||
| WireMockContainer container = new WireMockContainer( | ||
| new DockerImageName(WireMockContainer.WIREMOCK_2_LATEST.getUnversionedPart(), | ||
| WireMockContainer.WIREMOCK_2_LATEST.getVersionPart()+ "-test") | ||
| .asCompatibleSubstituteFor(WireMockContainer.WIREMOCK_2_LATEST)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| public void shouldInitWithVersionSubstitution() { | ||
| WireMockContainer container = new WireMockContainer( | ||
| new DockerImageName(WireMockContainer.OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME, "test") | ||
| .asCompatibleSubstituteFor(WireMockContainer.WIREMOCK_2_LATEST)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| @Disabled("Requires https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-java/issues/7305") | ||
| public void shouldFailForUnversionedImage() { | ||
| IllegalStateException ex = Assertions.assertThrows(IllegalStateException.class, () -> { | ||
| WireMockContainer container = new WireMockContainer( | ||
| new DockerImageName(WireMockContainer.OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME, "test")); | ||
| }); | ||
| assertThat(ex.getMessage()) | ||
| .as("Wrong exception message") | ||
| .contains("Failed to verify that image") | ||
| .contains("is a compatible substitute for '" + WireMockContainer.OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME + "'"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| public void shouldFailCustomImageWithoutSubstitution() { | ||
| IllegalStateException ex = Assertions.assertThrows(IllegalStateException.class, () -> { | ||
| WireMockContainer container = new WireMockContainer( | ||
| new DockerImageName("mycorp/mywiremockimage", WireMockContainer.WIREMOCK_2_LATEST.getVersionPart())); | ||
| }); | ||
| assertThat(ex.getMessage()) | ||
| .as("Wrong exception message") | ||
| .contains("Failed to verify that image") | ||
| .contains("is a compatible substitute for '" + WireMockContainer.OFFICIAL_IMAGE_NAME + "'"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe wold be better to use constructor without params in all tests
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will later create a TestConfig class, similar to wiremock/wiremock-docker#67. It will include a static method for tests