Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
67 changes: 67 additions & 0 deletions .claude/DEVELOPMENT_STAGES.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -730,3 +730,70 @@ Popcount random exposure: best topology quality for sparse 4096 graphs.
Root cause: centroids are AVERAGES of many tokens → smoother than raw weights.
Belichtungsmesser was designed for raw weight rows, not centroid averages.
```

### Family Bucketing: 99-100% on 4096 (BREAKTHROUGH)

```
Reclassify existing pairs into connected-component families:
μ+1.0σ: 9 families → 100% top-5, 100% top-10, 32 MB
μ+1.5σ: 50 families → 99% top-5, 100% top-10, 31 MB
μ+2.0σ: 93 families → 99% top-5, 100% top-10, 31 MB

Size dominated by one giant family (4000/4096).
With balanced families: 64 families × 64 centroids = 512 KB.

Architecture convergence with AutocompleteCache:
Family = precomputed autocomplete branch
32-step paths precomputed per family
Cross-family = family representative routing (50×50 = 2500 pairs)
Within-family = dense exact (64×64 = 4096 pairs per family)
Total: 2500 + 64×4096 = 264K pairs (vs 16.7M dense)
Comment on lines +748 to +750
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Use one family count in pair-budget estimate

This section mixes two different topologies in a single total: it first assumes a balanced 64 families × 64 centroids layout, but then computes cross-family routing as 50×50 while keeping within-family math at 64×64 per family. Because 2500 + 64×4096 combines incompatible assumptions, the reported 264K pairs is not reproducible for any single configuration and can mislead follow-on benchmarking or memory planning.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.


SiLU gates the TASK TYPE per family:
Deduction: family has strong causal chains (high gate, exploit)
Extrapolation: family extends beyond known data (medium gate)
Synthesis: cross-family merging (multiple families activate)
Inference: within-family refinement (dense, exact)
Association: nearest neighbor in family (1-hop)
Abduction: reverse reasoning (follow family backward)
Fan-out: expand to neighboring families (cross-family routing)
Counterfactual: negate family assignment (which family would ¬S be in?)

The gate E/I ratio per layer decides WHICH task type.
This IS the SPO 2^3 decomposition applied to the autocomplete order.
```

### Grey Matter: 128-Step RL Streaming Architecture

```
The 99% family bucketing means: thinking = cache lookup.
Grey matter streams 128 steps AHEAD of current thought.

Architecture:
Token 1-32: Current thought (within-family dense, exact)
Token 33-64: Speculative next (cross-family routing, predicted)
Token 65-128: Grey matter (RL policy, 2-3 hops precomputed)

RL Policy (20KB ONNX):
State: gate_pattern[28] + current_family_id
Action: next_family_id + confidence
Reward: next layer's gate agreement (epiphany = high reward)
Train: L4 holographic memory (accumulated experiences)

Storage:
64 families × 64 centroids × 128 steps = 512 KB routing tables
20 KB ONNX policy model
Total: 532 KB for 128-step speculative thinking

Speed:
Family routing: O(1) lookup (precomputed)
Within-family: 64×64 dense MatVec (4 KB, fits L1 cache)
Cross-family: 50×50 representative table (5 KB)
RL policy: 20 KB ONNX inference (~10μs)

Total per thought: ~50μs (routing) + ~600μs (MatVec) = ~650μs
128 steps ahead: 128 × 50μs = 6.4ms (grey matter, pipelined)

Effective: current thought at 650μs, next 128 steps at 6.4ms
That's 128 thoughts precomputed in the time of 10 MatVec cycles.
```