-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Add create_entity and delete_entity MCP tools #35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
visahak
merged 6 commits into
AgentToolkit:main
from
visahak:feature/add-create-delete-entity-mcp-tools
Jan 29, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2cbcd4c
Add create_entity and delete_entity MCP tools
visahak 21821c8
address reviewer issues
visahak 2016b4c
Fix: Lazy init for KaizenClient and handle None metadata in Milvus in…
visahak 1f92f52
Fix: Handle non-integer entity IDs and mock LLM in conflict resolutio…
visahak e37cd6b
fix: improve Milvus test isolation and error handling
visahak 20a538c
Merge branch 'main' into feature/add-create-delete-entity-mcp-tools
visahak File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Chain the exception for better traceability.
The validation logic is correct, but per Ruff B904, exceptions raised within
exceptblocks should useraise ... fromto preserve the original traceback.🔧 Proposed fix
def delete_entity_by_id(self, namespace_id: str, entity_id: str): try: entity_id_int = int(entity_id) except ValueError: - raise KaizenException(f"Invalid entity ID: {entity_id}. Entity IDs must be numeric.") + raise KaizenException(f"Invalid entity ID: {entity_id}. Entity IDs must be numeric.") from None self.validate_namespace(namespace_id) self.milvus.delete(collection_name=namespace_id, ids=[entity_id_int])🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.14.14)
199-199: Within an
exceptclause, raise exceptions withraise ... from errorraise ... from Noneto distinguish them from errors in exception handling(B904)
199-199: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class
(TRY003)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@visahak did you run ruff check before that? we have the ruff pre-commit hook setup
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gaodan-fang not really but the tests passed. did I miss something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just ran it, no issues in the committed files.