[PWGHF,PWGCF] Store charm hadron + track invariant mass in derived tree#12864
Conversation
|
O2 linter results: ❌ 44 errors, |
fgrosa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @zhangbiao-phy, this is good from HF side. @AntonRiedel @lauraser @victor-gonzalez could you please have a look and possibly approve from CF side? Thanks!
| fdhf::MultPercentile, | ||
| fdhf::Charge, | ||
| fdhf::PairSign, | ||
| fdhf::CharmTrkM, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are you aware that this will make the task not backwards compatible unless a converter is in place?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are you aware that this will make the task not backwards compatible unless a converter is in place?
Hi @victor-gonzalez, Thanks for pointing this out. This table is currently used only in my analysis, so backward compatibility isn’t required since I only add one more column now. If it’s adopted more broadly later, I’ll provide a converter.
No description provided.