chore: Accumulated backports to v4#22155
Merged
Merged
Conversation
## Summary The `testnet_compatibility` and `mainnet_compatibility` tests were only running on PRs targeting branches matching `^v[0-9]+$` (e.g. `v4`). This missed three other critical branches: - `backport-to-v4-staging` - `v4-next` - `backport-to-v4-next` This caused a compatibility break on staging-public (4.2.0-aztecnr.2 bricking nodes due to block header shape changes between 4.1 and 4.2) to go undetected. ## Fix Expanded the regex in `yarn-project/bootstrap.sh` to: ``` ^(v[0-9]+(-next)?|backport-to-v[0-9]+-(staging|next))$ ``` This matches all four required branch patterns while still excluding `next`, `master`, and other non-release branches. ClaudeBox log: https://claudebox.work/s/dd9d82043dbc175f?run=1
Collaborator
Author
|
🤖 Auto-merge enabled after 8 hours of inactivity. This PR will be merged automatically once all checks pass. |
Adapted block_store.ts for v4 branch structure: - Kept v4's inline previous-checkpoint-block extraction (no getPreviousCheckpointBlock helper) - Used checkpoints[0] reference instead of firstCheckpointNumber for post-skip correctness - Only included skipOrUpdateAlreadyStoredCheckpoints method (the actual fix) - Dropped getPreviousCheckpointBlock and validateCheckpointBlocks refactors from next
…2252) (#22257) ## Summary Backport of #22252 to v4. Fixes a mainnet issue where an L1 reorg moved a checkpoint to a different L1 block, causing the archiver to re-discover it and crash with `InitialCheckpointNumberNotSequentialError` in an infinite loop. When `addCheckpoints` receives a checkpoint that's already stored, it now: - **Accepts it** if the archive root matches (same content, just different L1 block) - **Updates the L1 metadata** (block number, timestamp, hash) and attestations - **Throws** if the archive root doesn't match (content mismatch — genuine conflict) ## Conflict Resolution Cherry-pick had one conflict in `block_store.ts`: - v4 uses inline code for extracting previous checkpoint block data; `next` refactored this into a `getPreviousCheckpointBlock()` helper. Kept v4's inline approach but updated to use `checkpoints[0]` reference (correct after potential skip of already-stored checkpoints). - Only ported `skipOrUpdateAlreadyStoredCheckpoints` method (the fix). Dropped `getPreviousCheckpointBlock` and `validateCheckpointBlocks` refactors that exist on `next` but not v4. ## Test Results - 176 passed in `kv_archiver_store.test.ts` - 33 passed in `archiver-sync.test.ts` (includes new `handles L1 reorg that moves a checkpoint to a later L1 block` test) - Build, format pass ClaudeBox log: https://claudebox.work/s/21a4c138364df1ef?run=1
PhilWindle
approved these changes
Apr 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BEGIN_COMMIT_OVERRIDE
fix: run compatibility tests on all v4-related branches (#22149)
END_COMMIT_OVERRIDE