test(azure.ai.agents): validate azure.yaml examples in docs - #9368
test(azure.ai.agents): validate azure.yaml examples in docs#9368Glenn Harper (glharper) wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
`azure.yaml` examples in this extension's docs weren't validated by anything, so they could drift out of sync with the code and ship broken. Two instances were found by hand recently: the README migration example omitted the required agent `name` (#9328), and a Learn article documented `rai_config.rai_policy_name`, which azd ignores entirely — deploying with no guardrail and no error. Adds TestDocExamplesAreValid, which extracts every fenced YAML block declaring an `azure.ai.agent` service from the extension's markdown and applies two checks: 1. Resolver — the snippet must survive AgentDefinitionFromService, the same entry point azd uses at deploy time. Catches the missing-`name` class. 2. Vocabulary — every property must be declared in schemas/azure.ai.agent.json or parsed by azd core. azd deliberately ignores unrecognized service properties for forward compatibility, which is exactly how a doc can advertise a setting that silently does nothing. Catches the `rai_config` class, which the resolver alone cannot. Not every snippet is meant to be complete: the three `azure.ai.agent` entries in docs/private-networking.md intentionally omit `kind` so azd falls back to the on-disk agent.yaml. Those opt out of check 1 with an `<!-- azd:doc-example partial -->` marker, keeping the default strict rather than inferring intent. Fixes #9330 Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: e7ba2e0e-80cf-4226-b56e-ac7cbbc7338f
📋 Prioritization NoteThanks for the contribution! The linked issue isn't in the current milestone yet. |
|
Azure Pipelines: Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). 21 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions. There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds automated validation to prevent azure.ai.agent documentation examples from drifting out of sync.
Changes:
- Extracts and validates fenced YAML examples.
- Adds explicit markers for intentionally partial snippets.
- Documents the validation convention.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
internal/project/doc_examples_test.go |
Adds extraction and validation tests. |
docs/private-networking.md |
Marks three examples as partial. |
AGENTS.md |
Documents validation requirements and opt-out usage. |
…pes and the full schema Co-authored-by: glharper <64209257+glharper@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (4)
cli/azd/extensions/azure.ai.agents/internal/project/doc_examples_test.go:278
- [azd-code-reviewer] These map fields do not apply core's actual shape rules as the helper claims. For example, core decodes
dockerintoproject.DockerProjectOptions, wherepathis a string, but this mirror acceptsdocker: {path: [Dockerfile]};checkVocabularythen skipsdockeras core-owned, so the broken snippet passes. Mirror the nested core types faithfully (also for K8s/Infra/Hooks), or use core's decoder.
Docker map[string]any `yaml:"docker"`
K8s map[string]any `yaml:"k8s"`
Module string `yaml:"module"`
Infra map[string]any `yaml:"infra"`
Hooks map[string]any `yaml:"hooks"`
cli/azd/extensions/azure.ai.agents/internal/project/doc_examples_test.go:407
- [azd-code-reviewer] This assertion only proves that one snippet was discovered. If any of the six existing examples changes its fence label, loses
host, or misspells it asazure.ai.agents, that example silently drops out while the test remains green. Assert the current baseline count (and update it for intentional additions/removals), or track the expected snippets individually so losing coverage is visible.
require.NotZero(t, checked, "no azure.ai.agent doc examples were found — is the extractor still working?")
cli/azd/extensions/azure.ai.agents/internal/project/doc_examples_test.go:130
- [azd-code-reviewer] Treating absent/
trueadditionalPropertiesas runtime support leaves the same silent-no-op gap for typed objects. The shipped schema marksagentEndpointandagentCardwithadditionalProperties: true, while runtime unmarshals them into fixed Go structs; thereforeagentEndpoint: {rai_config: ...}is ignored byjson.Unmarshaland still passes this vocabulary check. Tighten those schema nodes (while retaining genuinely free-form maps such as metadata/credentials) or validate them against the runtime types.
This issue also appears on line 274 of the same file.
if allowed, ok := additional.(bool); !declared || (ok && allowed) {
continue
cli/azd/extensions/azure.ai.agents/internal/project/doc_examples_test.go:402
- [azd-code-reviewer] The extractor has dedicated tests, but neither advertised validation rule has a committed negative regression test. With only valid live docs as fixtures, a change that makes
checkVocabularypermissive or stops enforcing resolver failures can leave this suite green; the temporary defect injections described in the PR will not protect future changes. Add table-driven invalid snippets for missingname, unknown top-level/nested properties, and the partial-marker exception.
checkVocabulary(t, e, name, svc, schema)
Jon Gallant (jongio)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One nit inline. Everything else checks out.
I ran the new test on the branch and mutated the docs to confirm each guard actually fires: dropping name from the README migration example reproduces the name cannot be empty failure from #9330, an undeclared key at the top level and one nested under policies[0] both fail with the file:line message, and project: [src] is a core parse error now instead of a silent coercion to "".
The extractor's nested-fence handling holds up too, so the example block inside AGENTS.md isn't picked up as its own snippet.
…ach structpb The two structpb.NewStruct assertions were the only doc-content-reachable ones without a message, so a value structpb can't represent failed with a bare "proto: invalid type: time.Time" and no hint about what to change. It is reachable from a snippet: an unquoted date under an extension-owned key (metadata: released: 2024-07-18) decodes to time.Time and fails exactly that way. Both assertions now report file:line/service and say to quote ambiguous scalars. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1d5b46e6-fc04-48bb-9a2c-156105966b48
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
Suppressed comments (1)
cli/azd/extensions/azure.ai.agents/internal/project/doc_examples_test.go:349
- [azd-code-reviewer] Add negative regression fixtures for the validation rules. The current docs are already valid, so this test still passes if the missing-name check or the top-level/recursive vocabulary rejection is accidentally weakened; the manually injected defects listed in the PR description are not preserved in CI. Table-driven snippets covering missing
name, an unknown service sibling, and an unknown nested property would lock down both defect classes this test is meant to catch.
func TestDocExamplesAreValid(t *testing.T) {
Jon Gallant (jongio)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One blocking item and one note.
Blocking: the new test fails CI on all three BuildExtension legs. It passes on this branch in isolation, which is why a local run looks clean. It only breaks against the merge with main. #9079 added a partial env: snippet to the extension README after this branch was cut, and strict-by-default rejects it for missing kind. Detail and the one-line fix are inline on the require.True assertion.
Note: the reply on my structpb thread posted as the literal text @C:\Users\glharper\AppData\Local\Temp\reply9368.md instead of the file contents, so whatever you wrote there isn't visible on the PR. Worth reposting.
…idate-doc-examples
The service-scoped env section added by #9079 shows only where `env:` belongs, so its snippet has no `kind:` and cannot resolve to a full agent definition. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: fed9e97b-e79b-4889-ac76-0d9a428599cd
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
Suppressed comments (1)
cli/azd/extensions/azure.ai.agents/internal/project/doc_examples_test.go:278
- [azd-code-reviewer] These untyped mirrors still do not apply core's nested shape rules. For example, a valid agent snippet containing
hooks: {predeploy: "echo hi"}passes thismap[string]anydecode and the resolver, but core'sHooksConfig.UnmarshalYAMLrejects that scalar because each hook must be a mapping or sequence (pkg/ext/hooks_config.go:33-72). The test would therefore approve an example that cannot be copied intoazure.yaml. Mirror the concrete nested field shapes (including their custom unmarshalling) or decode through core's actualServiceConfig; the same gap applies todocker,k8s, andinfra.
Docker map[string]any `yaml:"docker"`
K8s map[string]any `yaml:"k8s"`
Module string `yaml:"module"`
Infra map[string]any `yaml:"infra"`
Hooks map[string]any `yaml:"hooks"`
Jon Gallant (jongio)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The blocking item from my last review is cleared. I verified against the merge with main rather than the branch, since that's where it failed.
On 3ca6440 with main merged in, the suite validates 7 snippets and passes. Dropping the marker back out reproduces the exact CI signature I flagged:
README.md:63: service "my-agent" did not resolve to an agent definition (is `kind` missing?).
I also checked whether the marker buys more silence than intended, since the escape hatch is the part of this with the most room to go wrong later. It doesn't. With the marker still in place, an undeclared key on that same snippet fails:
README.md:64: service "my-agent" documents property "rai_config", which azd does not support.
and project: [src] fails with cannot be parsed by azd core. So partial drops only the "must resolve to an agent definition" assertion and leaves the vocabulary and core-parse checks running, which is what AGENTS.md describes.
The reply on the structpb thread that posted as a literal file path is showing real content now.
No new findings. My earlier approval went stale when these commits landed, so this still needs a current approval to merge.
Addresses review on #9368. Compile azure.ai.agent.json and validate the runtime-active inline or legacy config property map, so required, type, enum, pattern, and nested additionalProperties constraints are enforced in addition to the existing friendly vocabulary check. Reject extension properties in the inactive location because azd selects one shape rather than merging them. Replace untyped core service placeholders with strict test-only mirrors of Docker, AKS/Helm/Kustomize, infra/layers/deploymentStacks, and hook YAML. Mirror HooksConfig's mapping-or-list parsing and core's nil-hook validation, and reject nested core-field typos that azd would otherwise ignore. Regression coverage exercises each constraint and field family. The JSON Schema validator was already a transitive dependency; mark it direct now that the doc test imports it. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: b4617dfd-adfb-4b30-9222-477a041f8af9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
Suppressed comments (2)
cli/azd/extensions/azure.ai.agents/internal/project/doc_examples_test.go:989
- [azd-code-reviewer] This rejects valid workflow examples even though the runtime accepts inline
kind: workflowdefinitions (agent_yaml.ValidAgentKindsandTestLoadAgentDefinition_ResolvedKindValidation). The shipped schema currently permits onlyhostedand does not declare workflow'strigger, so a copyable workflow snippet would fail this docs test. Bring the schema/validator into parity with both supported agent kinds and add a valid workflow case.
require.NoError(t, schema.validate(active),
"%s: service %q %s properties do not satisfy schemas/azure.ai.agent.json. "+
"Fix the example so it can be copied into azure.yaml as-is.", e, name, location)
cli/azd/extensions/azure.ai.agents/internal/project/doc_examples_test.go:925
- [azd-code-reviewer] This is not the resolver used by deployment when a service has a root
$ref: deployment callsAgentDefinitionFromResolvedService, while this raw variant sees nokindand returnsfound=false. The later vocabulary check also rejects$refbecause it is not in the schema. As a result, a supported, copyable$refexample cannot pass this validator; validate through the resolved entry point (using the snippet's project root) and explicitly allow the include key.
cfg := serviceConfigFromDoc(t, e, name, svc)
_, _, found, _, err := AgentDefinitionFromService(cfg)
Fixes #9330
Problem
azure.yamlexamples in this extension's docs were not validated, so they could drift away from both the extension and azd core:README.mdonce omitted the required agentname; copying it failed withname cannot be empty(fix: name the azure.yaml key in the RAI policy validation error #9328).rai_config.rai_policy_name. azd ignored it, so the agent deployed with no guardrail and no error (MicrosoftDocs/azure-ai-docs-pr#13567).Approach
TestDocExamplesAreValidwalks the extension's markdown, extracts every fenced YAML block declaring anazure.ai.agentservice, and applies three checks.1. Runtime resolver
The snippet must survive
AgentDefinitionFromService, the same entry point the extension uses at deploy time. This catches missing/invalid agent definition values.2. Full extension JSON Schema
Extension-owned properties are validated against the compiled
schemas/azure.ai.agent.json, including:additionalPropertiesThe existing recursive vocabulary check remains because the schema's top-level
additionalPropertiesis deliberately permissive so core service fields can coexist with extension properties. Our own docs still reject an unknown extension key that azd would silently ignore.Inline and deprecated
configproperties are not validated as if they merge.activeDocAgentConfigmirrors runtime precedence: inline wins unless it omitskindandconfigdeclares it. If both locations contain extension properties, the inactive location is rejected because those values have no effect.3. Core-owned YAML shapes
Core service properties are decoded through strict test-only mirrors of the checked-in azd YAML shapes:
ServiceConfigThe top-level mirror retains
yaml:",inline"AdditionalProperties so extension properties remain legal. Nested core typos are rejected instead of silently ignored. Provider-specificinfra.configand hookconfigremain property bags intentionally.Partial snippets
Some snippets are deliberately incomplete. The private-networking examples omit
kindbecause the example is about the projectnetwork:block and azd falls back to on-diskagent.yaml.They opt out explicitly:
<!-- azd:doc-example partial -->The marker relaxes only the resolver's "must fully resolve" assertion. Schema, vocabulary, and core YAML checks still run. Default behavior remains strict, so accidentally dropping
kindfrom a complete example is not silently excused.Regression coverage
TestDocSchemaValidatesConstraintsproves the schema catches:modelskucapacitytypekindenum valueTestDecodeCoreServiceFieldsRejectsMalformedValuescovers top-level and nested type failures, unknown nested fields, scalar hooks, malformed hook fields, null hook mappings/list entries, infra hooks, and deployment-stack typos/types.TestActiveDocAgentConfigcovers inline/config runtime precedence and rejects ignored properties in the inactive location.TestExtractYAMLExamplescovers language filtering, marker scoping, indented-fence dedenting, and CommonMark fence-length nesting.Current docs contribute 7 validated agent snippets: 4 in
README.mdand 3 indocs/private-networking.md. New markdown examples are picked up automatically.Validation
From
cli/azd/extensions/azure.ai.agents:go build ./...go test ./... -count=1gofmt -s -l internal/project— cleangolangci-lint run ./internal/project/...— 0 issuesgit diff --check— cleanThe complete local diff was reviewed three times before push. Those reviews caught and fixed runtime shape precedence, null hook validation, nested core typos, and typed deployment-stack validation.
Notes
cli/azdchanges.jsonschema/v6was already a transitive dependency and is now marked direct because the test imports it;go.sumis unchanged.CHANGELOG.mdentry, per the extension release process.AGENTS.mddocuments the convention and escape hatch.schemas/examples/*.azure.yamlthe single source of truth) remains complementary but is deliberately outside this PR.