[Ready for review] Updated batch to support batch account creation with fluent pattern.#1066
Conversation
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
1 similar comment
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
anudeepsharma
force-pushed
the
Batch
branch
4 times, most recently
from
8c6854e to
65b1f64
Compare
anudeepsharma
changed the title
anudeepsharma
force-pushed
the
Batch
branch
9 times, most recently
from
7c51926 to
12ccba3
Compare
|
@azuresdkci add to whitelist |
|
Runtime changes detected. pull request created. CI running: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it looks like this is a separate call to Azure. If that's the case, we're starting to follow the convention to use "get" as the prefix on such methods, to indicate the info is not a property but a separate method that calls Azure. So in this case, we could call this getKeys()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changed it to set of 2 functions keys and refreshKeys which are similar to Storage key apis.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i'm guessing you mean .keys() would quickly return the locally cached keys and refreshKeys() would make th actual call (and return the keys as well, right?) that makes sense to me as well.
I assume this will be added to this PR (not seeing a new commit yet)
anudeepsharma
force-pushed
the
Batch
branch
from
12ccba3 to
1bf5330
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the convention we use for removing things is "without..." so it'd be withoutStorageAccount()
anudeepsharma
force-pushed
the
Batch
branch
from
1bf5330 to
3ffdf38
Compare
[Ready for review] Updated batch to support batch account creation with fluent pattern.
5 participants
Updated batch to support batch account creation with fluent pattern.