Skip to content

Update STS end point handling logic in service bus configuration. #364

Merged
gcheng merged 2 commits into
Azure:devfrom
gcheng:mooncake
Jun 11, 2013
Merged

Update STS end point handling logic in service bus configuration. #364
gcheng merged 2 commits into
Azure:devfrom
gcheng:mooncake

Conversation

@gcheng

@gcheng gcheng commented Jun 10, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Updates the logic to handle STS end points in ServiceBusConnectionSettings.

#358

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: need to make sure that connectionString.getStsEndpoint() doesn't have / at the end so you don't end up with double //

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed.

@ogail

ogail commented Jun 10, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Maybe it's good to add a unit test with a customized StsEndpoint to make sure that the code parses and uses the value correctly

@gcheng

gcheng commented Jun 11, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I am pro unit test, but this class is a private class, so it is not testable as a unit test. However, our integration test does cover this.

gcheng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2013
Update STS end point handling logic in service bus configuration.
@gcheng
gcheng merged commit bb2dc56 into Azure:dev Jun 11, 2013
jianghaolu pushed a commit to jianghaolu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2017
Update STS end point handling logic in service bus configuration.
g2vinay pushed a commit to g2vinay/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2019
…view-dev

New storage sdk v10 preview dev
sima-zhu pushed a commit to sima-zhu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants