Skip to content

Upgrade netty depedencies to latest version#6554

Merged
srnagar merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
netty-version-upgrade
Nov 26, 2019
Merged

Upgrade netty depedencies to latest version#6554
srnagar merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
netty-version-upgrade

Conversation

@srnagar

@srnagar srnagar commented Nov 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Upgrading some of the internal netty dependencies used by reactor-netty to the latest version.

Comment thread sdk/core/azure-core-http-netty/pom.xml
@srnagar
srnagar merged commit 356efe7 into master Nov 26, 2019
Comment thread sdk/core/azure-core-http-netty/pom.xml
<dependency>
<groupId>io.netty</groupId>
<artifactId>netty-transport-native-unix-common</artifactId>
<version>4.1.42.Final</version>

@hemanttanwar hemanttanwar Nov 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we use this latest version 4.1.43.Final ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are using 4.1.42.Final for all netty dependencies. So, I used the same version for these two as well. I will look into 4.1.43.Final for the next release.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sharing my general opinion on dependencies: we want to be fast followers rather than jumping to the newest version immediately. If we can understand where the community is (and I have tooling that can help here), we can move in step with the pack to try to minimise dependency conflicts.

@conniey
conniey deleted the netty-version-upgrade branch December 20, 2019 03:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants