Skip to content

Uptake Enum-driven visibility - #1829

Merged
witemple-msft merged 7 commits into
Azure:mainfrom
witemple-msft:witemple-msft/visibility-enum
Nov 8, 2024
Merged

Uptake Enum-driven visibility#1829
witemple-msft merged 7 commits into
Azure:mainfrom
witemple-msft:witemple-msft/visibility-enum

Conversation

@witemple-msft

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR is for validation of the uptake of microsoft/typespec#4825

It masks some no-deprecated lint errors that result from the deprecation of getVisibility

@azure-sdk

azure-sdk commented Nov 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

All changed packages have been documented.

  • @azure-tools/typespec-autorest
  • @azure-tools/typespec-azure-core
  • @azure-tools/typespec-azure-resource-manager
  • @azure-tools/typespec-client-generator-core
Show changes

@azure-tools/typespec-autorest - internal ✏️

Mask deprecation lint warnings for uptake of enum-driven visibility.

@azure-tools/typespec-azure-core - internal ✏️

Mask deprecation lint warnings for uptake of enum-driven visibility.

@azure-tools/typespec-azure-resource-manager - internal ✏️

Mask deprecation lint warnings for uptake of enum-driven visibility.

@azure-tools/typespec-client-generator-core - internal ✏️

Mask deprecation lint warnings for uptake of enum-driven visibility.

@azure-sdk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

You can try these changes here

🛝 Playground 🌐 Website 📚 Next docs

@witemple-msft
witemple-msft added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into Azure:main with commit f9689c4 Nov 8, 2024
@witemple-msft
witemple-msft deleted the witemple-msft/visibility-enum branch November 8, 2024 18:15
markcowl pushed a commit to markcowl/typespec-azure that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
This PR is for validation of the uptake of
microsoft/typespec#4825

It masks some no-deprecated lint errors that result from the deprecation
of `getVisibility`

---------

Co-authored-by: Will Temple <will@wtemple.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants