issues: complete universal recommended queue#1113
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 57 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6401aeb899
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| | #063 | P2 | task | Reconcile the preserved browser and contrast patch | **Outcome:** the isolated dirty formulation/contrast patch is either safely landed or explicitly dispositioned. **Next:** rebase its intent against current `main` without overwriting the worktree, then run focused Playwright coverage and `verify:ui`. **Success:** intended disabled/contrast behavior is accessible, browser assertions remain meaningful, and unrelated work is preserved. **Stop:** do not discard or auto-merge the dirty worktree; pause on ambiguous ownership or scope. | `agent/formulation-disabled-contrast`; session 2026-07-24 | 2026-07-24 | | ||
| | #064 | P2 | task | Complete the paused compact document source-text accordion | **Outcome:** the document viewer uses compact nested disclosures while retaining complete text, citation/search navigation, print behavior, and composer clearance. **Next:** only when the user explicitly resumes, reconcile `codex/chat-document-text-accordion-7cb4` with current `main` and complete the focused 320/390/1280 px tests. **Success:** default disclosures are closed; deep links and search open only the active passage; printing expands/restores state; no overflow. **Verify:** focused document-viewer Playwright, `verify:cheap`, `verify:ui`, and static production-readiness. **Stop:** remain paused until explicit user return; no provider calls. | paused document-viewer task; `codex/chat-document-text-accordion-7cb4` | 2026-07-24 | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Make paused worktree references recoverable
Rows #63 and #64 add recommended P2 work that depends on agent/formulation-disabled-contrast and codex/chat-document-text-accordion-7cb4, but those identifiers are not present in the local refs, registered worktrees, stash, or any repo file except this ledger row (checked with rg, git for-each-ref, git worktree list, and git stash list). When /issues surfaces this as durable cross-session work, the next operator has no recoverable patch to rebase and can only stall or recreate/lose the preserved work; please commit/export the patch or replace these rows with a concrete durable source.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L453-L460
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Summary
#023P2 correction and keep provider actions approval-gatedValidation
npm run docs:check-links: passed (1,144 references)npm run docs:check-index: passednpm run check:skills: passedgit diff --check: passedRisk
Documentation-only task-memory correction. No application code, migrations, provider configuration, secrets, production data, or deployment behavior changes.
RAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change — task-ledger documentation only.
Note
Low Risk
Documentation-only ledger repair in
docs/outstanding-issues.md; no runtime, secrets, or application behavior changes.Overview
Repairs
docs/outstanding-issues.mdso the recommended execution queue and open-items table stay aligned after a competing ledger merge.A1 now explicitly covers credential containment, the Safety Plan privacy contract, and the legal/privacy package. The queue grows to 35 ordered rows with new top priorities
#059(exposed-credential containment),#060(Safety Plan vs privacy notice/PIA), and#061(fail-closed answer relevance), plus dependency links (e.g.#052after#061,#062stranded-upload recovery after#052). Previously omitted work is queued:#063contrast/browser patch,#064paused document accordion,#035,#039, and#065(Current Clinical Work brief).Adds seven open rows (
#059–#065) with outcomes, gates, and stop conditions; expands#054reconciliation wording; bumpsissues:next-idto 066.Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6401aeb. Configure here.