Fix design/UX defects #068–#072 from sitewide review - #1135
Conversation
Append the main@6ceaaff5 production-page design/UX review outcome and checks so the same HEAD+scope is not re-reviewed without an explicit fresh pass.
|
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 25 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdates launcher filtering and labels, client-side clinical navigation, disabled placeholder controls, differential workflow tabs and comparison indicators, regression coverage, and review issue ledgers. No product code fixes are claimed in the branch-review record. ChangesUI remediation and audit records
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels: Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@cursoragent please can you resolve the branch conflicts here for me. |
|
❌ Unable to add follow-up after multiple attempts. The agent may be experiencing issues. Please try again later or Open in Web to view the status.   Learn more about Cursor Agents |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7066d631b3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Wire presentation mobile tabs to diagnosis section deep-links, replace the self-linking Compare dock with a Comparing status, convert fake Evidence Add controls to coming-soon placeholders, make Tools Sort/More affordances honest, and use router.push for mode-action internal navigation.
Move the fixed presentation, Tools, Evidence Add, and soft-navigation defects to the resolved archive and restore a contiguous recommended queue.
cursor
Bot
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/branch-review-ledger.md`:
- Line 23: Update the reviewed branch entry in the ledger to use a qualified
branch token such as origin/main so scripts/sweep-branch-ledger.mjs includes it
in parseLedgerBranches() coverage; preserve the canonical main branch identity
and existing review details.
In `@docs/outstanding-issues.md`:
- Around line 94-95: Remove the blank line between the consecutive blockquote
lines in the merged-main canary update so the blockquote remains continuous and
satisfies markdownlint MD028.
In `@src/components/differentials/differential-presentation-workflow-page.tsx`:
- Around line 709-729: Use native disabled controls for all unavailable actions:
add disabled to both density buttons in
src/components/differentials/differential-presentation-workflow-page.tsx lines
709-729, the Add button in src/components/clinical-dashboard/evidence-panels.tsx
lines 845-857, and the Add button in
src/components/clinical-dashboard/visual-evidence.tsx lines 678-690 while
preserving their existing aria-disabled, coming-soon title, and accessible note;
update the assertions in tests/mobile-interaction-regressions.test.ts lines
67-76 to require native disabled alongside the accessibility copy.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: ea539167-19b5-4781-a57b-50a1c8d4a002
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
docs/branch-review-ledger.mddocs/outstanding-issues.mdsrc/components/applications-launcher-page.tsxsrc/components/clinical-dashboard/evidence-panels.tsxsrc/components/clinical-dashboard/master-search-header.tsxsrc/components/clinical-dashboard/visual-evidence.tsxsrc/components/differentials/differential-presentation-workflow-page.tsxtests/mobile-interaction-regressions.test.ts
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
GitHub review-comment reply returned 403, so the outdated Codex acuity thread was resolved with the GraphQL resolveReviewThread mutation. Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Qualify the sitewide review ledger ref as origin/main for sweep parsing, fix the outstanding-issues blockquote blank (MD028), and record the babysit disposition. Keep focusable aria-disabled coming-soon placeholders.
2 participants
Summary
Implements and archives the confirmed production design/UX defects from the sitewide review on
main@6ceaaff5:?tab=sections.router.pushfor internal DSM/Specifiers/Formulation routes.#068–#072indocs/outstanding-issues.md.Verification
http://localhost:4461(presentation tab hrefs, Comparing dock, Sorted A to Z, diagnosis?tab=map/related)tsc --noEmit)verify:cheap/verify:ui— changes are scoped UI honesty/wiring; focused proof used insteadClinical KB governance preflight
RAG impact
RAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change — UI wiring/honesty only.
Risk and rollout
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests