Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Much better than the hack I cooked up. |
Killswitch00
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2016
Use remote exec in network
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
alternative solution for #269 and #270
This way we can completely ignore all security things as they are handled by
CfgRemoteExecand BI's / Battleyes security framework.Also changes
CBA_fnc_globalSayandCBA_fnc_globalSay3dto useremoteExecCalltest:
The function header of
CBA_fnc_globalSay3dclaims that you can use an array of objects as targets (similar toCBA_fnc_globalSay, probably copy paste ...). That was broken and caused a script error. Fixed now.