Skip to content

Show audit log retention in pricing#698

Merged
riderx merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/audit-log-retention
May 14, 2026
Merged

Show audit log retention in pricing#698
riderx merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/audit-log-retention

Conversation

@riderx
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@riderx riderx commented May 14, 2026

Summary

  • Change the pricing comparison Audit logs value from an included checkmark to 90 days

Test

  • NODE_OPTIONS=--max-old-space-size=16384 bunx astro check

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Pricing comparison now displays specific audit logs retention limits (90 days) instead of generic availability indicators for clearer plan differentiation.

Review Change Stack

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 14, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 2f2f3bb4-c7ba-4d7d-95a3-2d73396cafe6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a9656a and 8a31de3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/components/pricing/ComparePlans.astro

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pricing comparison table updates the "Audit logs" feature row to display a specific retention limit ("90 days") instead of a generic boolean inclusion indicator, changing how that cell renders across plan columns.

Changes

Pricing Comparison Table

Layer / File(s) Summary
Audit logs retention period display
apps/web/src/components/pricing/ComparePlans.astro
The "Audit logs" row value changes from boolean true to the string '90 days', rendering the feature as a specific retention limit instead of an inclusion checkmark.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops through pricing tiers so bright,
Where audit logs now show their retention right—
Ninety days of history, no longer vague,
Each plan displays the truth, no more a plague!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title clearly and accurately summarizes the main change: displaying audit log retention duration (90 days) in the pricing comparison table instead of a boolean value.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/audit-log-retention

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

ESLint skipped: no ESLint configuration detected in root package.json. To enable, add eslint to devDependencies.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@riderx riderx merged commit de9ea90 into main May 14, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant