chore: use U256 for EthBigInt#7201
Conversation
Walkthrough
ChangesEthBigInt U256 migration
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsStopped waiting for pipeline failures after 30000ms. One of your pipelines takes longer than our 30000ms fetch window to run, so review may not consider pipeline-failure results for inline comments if any failures occurred after the fetch window. Increase the timeout if you want to wait longer or run a Comment |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files
... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Summary of changes
Changes introduced in this pull request:
U256as an underlying type forEthBigInt- this is better because there's no heap allocation involved there (U256 vs sign + vec)Reference issue to close (if applicable)
Closes #4436
Other information and links
Change checklist
Outside contributions
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Bug Fixes