asserted 'has value' data property and added definitions#331
Conversation
|
'has value' means exactly the same thing as topDataProperty. All data properties have a range that is a data value, i.e an rdfs:Literal. Also note the relation to the value specification proposal. |
|
@cameronmore Per @alanruttenberg 's comment, seems cco:has_value should be deprecated. Concur? |
|
I just want to tag @mark-jensen since he originally discussed this in #188 |
|
@neilotte cco:has_value is a new data property so it needn't be deprecated. I do not think we are ready to introduce cco:has_value. Per issue #188, we still have not resolved its domain. The current set of CCO data properties all use IBE, which is not universally accepted as preferrable. As @alanruttenberg stated elsewhere (too many issues and discussions for me to find it quickly), we probably will have to delay this until 1.7. |
|
I agree, introduction of new datatypes should be coordinated with @alanruttenberg 's value specification proposal and its design pattern. I will remove reference to it, and I will change the range of cco:has_text_value to an xsd:string or rdf:langString which solves the original reasoning error. Related, this is an interesting proposal for the creation of xsd:InternationalizedString |
|
@cameronmore In that case, can we close this PR? |
neilotte
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good work @cameronmore. Approving.
|
@mark-jensen -- Can you also review this? @cameronmore requested your review as well. |
Implemented a change discussed in #188 and added definitions for data properties