Skip to content

259 use of instance of in has member of located in definition and other ero definitions#350

Merged
neilotte merged 3 commits into
CommonCoreOntology:developfrom
cameronmore:259-use-of-instance-of-in-has-member-of-located-in-definition-and-other-ero-definitions
Aug 18, 2024
Merged

259 use of instance of in has member of located in definition and other ero definitions#350
neilotte merged 3 commits into
CommonCoreOntology:developfrom
cameronmore:259-use-of-instance-of-in-has-member-of-located-in-definition-and-other-ero-definitions

Conversation

@cameronmore
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@cameronmore cameronmore requested a review from neilotte August 12, 2024 12:53
@cameronmore
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

cameronmore commented Aug 12, 2024

Addresses #127 and #259

@gregfowlerphd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The change from 'has member of located in' to 'has all members of located in' definitely seems good. However, while you made that change in the label, you didn't do so in the definition.

@cameronmore
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

cameronmore commented Aug 13, 2024

@gregfowlerphd myintent was to make the label more accurately reflect the definition, rather than change the semantics of the term, and then to introduce the other relation whose label and definition makes it distinct from the already existing one.

This also avoids a case of deprecation.

@gregfowlerphd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Right. My point (which maybe I expressed poorly) is that the definition for the object property cco: has_some_member_of_located_in starts with 'x has member of located in y iff...'. Notice the lack of the word 'some' here.

@cameronmore
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gregfowlerphd ah I see, thanks!

@neilotte neilotte merged commit ca0a46e into CommonCoreOntology:develop Aug 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use of ‘instance of’ in ‘has member of located in’ definition and other ERO definitions Revise the object property 'has member of located in'

3 participants