Skip to content

corrected process starts definition#594

Merged
neilotte merged 2 commits into
developfrom
process-start-fix
Feb 9, 2025
Merged

corrected process starts definition#594
neilotte merged 2 commits into
developfrom
process-start-fix

Conversation

@cameronmore
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The current definition asserted that a temporal interval 'interval contains' a temporal instant, but the range of 'interval contains' is a one-dimensional temporal region, and a temporal instant is a zero dimensional temporal region.

@neilotte neilotte added the for 2.1 release These are changes we would like to see addressed under the 2.1 release label Jan 26, 2025
@neilotte neilotte added this to the 2.1 Release milestone Jan 26, 2025
Updated 'r is an instant of' to 'r is an instance of'
rdfs:label "process starts"@en ;
skos:definition "x process_starts y iff x and y are instances of processes, and x is_cause_of y, and i is an instance of a temporal instant, and r is an instant of a temporal interval, and y has starting instance i, and x occurs on r, and r interval contains i."@en ;
skos:definition "x process_starts y iff x and y are instances of processes, and x is_cause_of y, and i is an instance of a temporal instant, and r is an instant of a temporal interval, and y has starting instance i, and x occurs on r, and r has inside instant i."@en ;
skos:scopeNote "A process x starts another process y when x causes y while x is still occurring."@en ;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cameronmore Looks good. However, there's a typo in the original that appears to be maintained in the revision. It should read 'r is an instance of' and not 'r is an instant of'. Please consider running a quick text search for this phrase and replace in this PR.

@neilotte neilotte merged commit 8eaf367 into develop Feb 9, 2025
@neilotte neilotte deleted the process-start-fix branch February 9, 2025 02:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

for 2.1 release These are changes we would like to see addressed under the 2.1 release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants