Alma9 more changes (mk2)#12905
Conversation
|
Hi @sej7278. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Mab879
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like there is merge conflict now. Hopefully we can get the approvals soon.
cc for review
@ComplianceAsCode/suse-maintainers
@ComplianceAsCode/oracle-maintainers
|
Lol, I'll rebase in the morning, problem is other stuff is getting merged quicker than this 🤣 |
5849e08 to
dd7e95e
Compare
|
ok, rebased again, seems like its just the |
…ux profiles by negating it
…inux_os/guide/system/
dd7e95e to
fd3cc71
Compare
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit fd3cc71 and detected 0 issues on this pull request. The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold). This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 61.9% (0.0% change). View more on Code Climate. |
|
Overriding CODEOWNERS since it is just excluding a rule from SUSE. |
Replaces #12883 which got closed accidentally.
Rebased against master (resolved 2 conflicts).