docs: record aFIPC required workflow coverage gap - #124
Conversation
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues. FindingsNo blocking findings. SummaryPR adds accurate documentation of aFIPC workflow gap and regression test. Verification posture: Linter/static: N/A (docs/test only), TDD/regression: Added test case, Coverage: 100%, Docstring coverage: 100%, DAG: N/A (docs change), PoC/execution: Verified test passes, DDD/domain: Matches governance audit patterns, CDD/context: Consistent with repo docs, Similar issues: N/A, Claim/concept check: Verified against repo state, Standards search: N/A, Compatibility/convention: Follows existing patterns, Breaking-change/backcompat: N/A, Performance: N/A, Developer experience: Improves audit clarity, User experience: Clearer documentation, Security/privacy: N/A. Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including PR_GOVERNANCE_AUDIT.md, docs/org-required-workflow-rollout.md, tests/test_pr_governance_audit_contract.py.
Change Flow DAGflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: PR_GOVERNANCE_AUDIT.md"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: PR_GOVERNANCE_AUDIT.md"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs: org-required-workflow-rollout.md"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Docs: org-required-workflow-rollout.md"]
R2 --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test: test_pr_governance_audit_contract.py"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: Test: test_pr_governance_audit_contract.py"]
R3 --> V3["targeted test run"]
|
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including PR_GOVERNANCE_AUDIT.md, docs/org-required-workflow-rollout.md, tests/test_pr_governance_audit_contract.py.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% test coverage for the current head.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% docstring coverage for the current head.
DAG: Change Flow DAG maps PR_GOVERNANCE_AUDIT.md through bounded evidence, review risk, and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, and current-head workflow evidence were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions and compatibility surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: changed files did not identify a user-facing UI surface; bounded evidence was reviewed for UX impact.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: No blockers found in the PR. All changes are consistent with repository conventions and standards.
- Head SHA:
e624a39c61ddd18cdebf2fbbcf878b88c4014136 - Workflow run: 28356074467
- Workflow attempt: 2
Change Flow DAG
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: PR_GOVERNANCE_AUDIT.md"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: PR_GOVERNANCE_AUDIT.md"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs: org-required-workflow-rollout.md"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Docs: org-required-workflow-rollout.md"]
R2 --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test: test_pr_governance_audit_contract.py"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: Test: test_pr_governance_audit_contract.py"]
R3 --> V3["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
PR adds accurate documentation of aFIPC workflow gap and regression test. Verification posture: Linter/static: N/A (docs/test only), TDD/regression: Added test case, Coverage: 100%, Docstring coverage: 100%, DAG: N/A (docs change), PoC/execution: Verified test passes, DDD/domain: Matches governance audit patterns, CDD/context: Consistent with repo docs, Similar issues: N/A, Claim/concept check: Verified against repo state, Standards search: N/A, Compatibility/convention: Follows existing patterns, Breaking-change/backcompat: N/A, Performance: N/A, Developer experience: Improves audit clarity, User experience: Clearer documentation, Security/privacy: N/A.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including PR_GOVERNANCE_AUDIT.md, docs/org-required-workflow-rollout.md, tests/test_pr_governance_audit_contract.py.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% test coverage for the current head.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% docstring coverage for the current head.
DAG: Change Flow DAG maps PR_GOVERNANCE_AUDIT.md through bounded evidence, review risk, and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, and current-head workflow evidence were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions and compatibility surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: changed files did not identify a user-facing UI surface; bounded evidence was reviewed for UX impact.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Documentation and test improvements with full coverage
- Head SHA:
b065ccced71f0537eef831de1734cabf2b45a8f4 - Workflow run: 28357704214
- Workflow attempt: 1
Change Flow DAG
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: PR_GOVERNANCE_AUDIT.md"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: PR_GOVERNANCE_AUDIT.md"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs: org-required-workflow-rollout.md"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Docs: org-required-workflow-rollout.md"]
R2 --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test: test_pr_governance_audit_contract.py"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: Test: test_pr_governance_audit_contract.py"]
R3 --> V3["targeted test run"]
1 participant
Summary
ContextualWisdomLab/aFIPCis missing inherited central required workflow checks on PR Document central required workflows activation #78PRruleset evidence: onlycheck,quality, andsecret-and-workflow-auditare required, with zero approving reviewsVerification
git diff --checkpy -m pytest -q tests/test_pr_governance_audit_contract.pyOperational note
This does not mutate organization ruleset
18156473; my token cannot read the org ruleset endpoint (404). It preserves the drift evidence and the required admin action instead of pretendingaFIPC#78can be safely merged under the central-review contract.