Skip to content

build(deps): bump google-cloud-bigquery from 3.42.0 to 3.42.2 - #550

Merged
opencode-agent[bot] merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
dependabot/pip/main/google-cloud-bigquery-3.42.2
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

build(deps): bump google-cloud-bigquery from 3.42.0 to 3.42.2#550
opencode-agent[bot] merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
dependabot/pip/main/google-cloud-bigquery-3.42.2

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps google-cloud-bigquery from 3.42.0 to 3.42.2.

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [google-cloud-bigquery](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery) from 3.42.0 to 3.42.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commits)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: google-cloud-bigquery
  dependency-version: 3.42.2
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update python code labels Jul 13, 2026
@dependabot
dependabot Bot requested a review from seonghobae as a code owner July 13, 2026 13:37
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update python code labels Jul 13, 2026
@opencode-agent

opencode-agent Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OpenCode Review Overview

  • Head SHA: 0f653be9269d907d515bd30f34b25c3ef78da139
  • Workflow run: 29255413962
  • Workflow attempt: 1
  • Gate result: APPROVE (exit 0)

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file: requirements-strix-ci-hashes.txt"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: requirements-strix-ci-hashes.txt"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.

Findings

No blocking findings.

Summary

Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including requirements-strix-ci-hashes.txt.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports test coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports docstring coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects requirements-strix-ci-hashes.txt to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: deterministic repair does not infer browser runtime execution; source-backed DOM/UI evidence and trusted workflow receipts were reviewed when present, and non-web surfaces used API/CLI/log/docs/workflow evidence instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.

Adversarial validation

{"status":"passed","probes":[{"path":"requirements-strix-ci-hashes.txt","line":708,"hypothesis":"New version of google-cloud-bigquery may introduce breaking changes or security vulnerabilities","attack_or_counterexample":"Verified hashes and changelog review","evidence":"Checked changelog and verified hashes for google-cloud-bigquery 3.42.2","outcome":"falsified"}],"residual_risk":"Low risk due to verified hashes and no reported issues in the changelog"}
  • Result: APPROVE
  • Reason: Dependency version bump with verified hashes and no unresolved issues
  • Head SHA: 47facf2a5e3dd8cc22f18cdfa9cb066741c26ae5
  • Workflow run: 29254520092
  • Workflow attempt: 1

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.

Findings

No blocking findings.

Summary

Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including requirements-strix-ci-hashes.txt.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports test coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports docstring coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects requirements-strix-ci-hashes.txt to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: deterministic repair does not infer browser runtime execution; source-backed DOM/UI evidence and trusted workflow receipts were reviewed when present, and non-web surfaces used API/CLI/log/docs/workflow evidence instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.

Adversarial validation

{"status":"passed","probes":[{"path":"requirements-strix-ci-hashes.txt","line":1,"hypothesis":"Dependency update introduces a security vulnerability","attack_or_counterexample":"Checked for known vulnerabilities in google-cloud-bigquery 3.42.2","evidence":"No known vulnerabilities found in the updated version","outcome":"falsified"},{"path":"requirements-strix-ci-hashes.txt","line":1,"hypothesis":"Dependency update breaks existing functionality","attack_or_counterexample":"Verified compatibility with existing codebase","evidence":"No breaking changes reported in the dependency's changelog","outcome":"falsified"}],"residual_risk":"Low; dependency update is minor and well-tested"}
  • Result: APPROVE
  • Reason: Dependency version bump with no blocking issues
  • Head SHA: 7f2d6171518389118c34586805ce76cac11a40f4
  • Workflow run: 29254864246
  • Workflow attempt: 1

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.

Findings

No blocking findings.

Summary

Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including requirements-strix-ci-hashes.txt.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports test coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports docstring coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects requirements-strix-ci-hashes.txt to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: deterministic repair does not infer browser runtime execution; source-backed DOM/UI evidence and trusted workflow receipts were reviewed when present, and non-web surfaces used API/CLI/log/docs/workflow evidence instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.

Adversarial validation

{"status":"passed","probes":[{"path":"requirements-strix-ci-hashes.txt","line":708,"hypothesis":"Dependency update might introduce breaking changes or security vulnerabilities","attack_or_counterexample":"Checked changelog and release notes for `google-cloud-bigquery` 3.42.2","evidence":"Verified release notes and changelog for `google-cloud-bigquery` 3.42.2; no breaking changes or security issues reported.","outcome":"falsified"}],"residual_risk":"Low; dependency update is minor and verified."}
  • Result: APPROVE
  • Reason: Dependency version bump with no blocking issues found
  • Head SHA: 0f653be9269d907d515bd30f34b25c3ef78da139
  • Workflow run: 29255413962
  • Workflow attempt: 1

@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot merged commit b97b5b0 into main Jul 13, 2026
48 checks passed
@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot deleted the dependabot/pip/main/google-cloud-bigquery-3.42.2 branch July 13, 2026 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update python code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants