build(deps): bump actions/download-artifact from 7.0.0 to 8.0.1 - #596
Conversation
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
db58a35 to
0634c41
Compare
|
@dependabot rebase |
|
Looks like this PR has been edited by someone other than Dependabot. That means Dependabot can't rebase it - sorry! If you're happy for Dependabot to recreate it from scratch, overwriting any edits, you can request |
|
@dependabot recreate |
Bumps [actions/download-artifact](https://github.com/actions/download-artifact) from 7.0.0 to 8.0.1. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/download-artifact/releases) - [Commits](actions/download-artifact@37930b1...3e5f45b) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/download-artifact dependency-version: 8.0.1 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
f5e7cd6 to
529fbb2
Compare
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 3 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Comment |
|
@dependabot rebase |
|
Looks like this PR is already up-to-date with main! If you'd still like to recreate it from scratch, overwriting any edits, you can request |
seonghobae
left a comment
seonghobae
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pinned action-only update. The existing artifact name/path contract is unchanged; v8's digest-mismatch failure default strengthens integrity and the workflow does not depend on fork-specific internals.
…as deep failover (#716) * ci(opencode-review): add 5 free Zen models across distinct providers as deep failover Expand the anonymous OpenCode Zen free reviewer pool from 7 to 12 models by adding five zero-cost, tool_call-capable models from five distinct upstream providers: hy3-free (Tencent Hy), minimax-m3-free (MiniMax), glm-5-free (Zhipu GLM), kimi-k2.5-free (Moonshot Kimi), and qwen3.6-plus-free (Alibaba Qwen). Each is verified tool_call=true in the models.dev opencode registry and carries the reasoning high-effort options/variants structure the contract requires. They are appended after the active free models in OPENCODE_MODEL_CANDIDATES, so free-first ordering holds and they are only reached once the active free pool is exhausted -- the exact scenario (free-pool exhaustion blocking all PR reviews) this hardens against. Distinct providers mean distinct outage domains, so a bad day for one upstream no longer drains the whole free tier before the paid fallback. The per-run dynamic budget cap plus the fatal-provider-error fast-kill already bound worst-case failover latency, so extra candidates add resilience without multiplying bad-day cost. Also fix a pre-existing contract drift: the coverage-evidence assertion still pinned the download-artifact v7.0.0 SHA after dependabot bumped the workflow to v8.0.1 (#596); align the expected SHA with the workflow. Contract updated in lockstep (tests/test_opencode_agent_contract.py): the public-conditional candidate string, the candidates prefix, the full candidate_pairs ordering, and the set(free_models) equality. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AzUnTqFnQqhRbaopvDdag7 * test(opencode-review): assert tool_call support for the entire free pool The contract previously verified tool_call=true for only three hand-picked free models (nemotron-3-ultra-free, deepseek-v4-flash-free, north-mini-code-free). The reviewer drives CodeGraph/web-search tooling, so any free-pool candidate that lacks tool_call cannot emit a structured review and would burn its failover slot before yielding -- exactly the silent regression a future pool edit could introduce. Extend the existing free-model loop to assert tool_call is True for every candidate, securing coverage of the invariant the whole free-first failover chain depends on. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AzUnTqFnQqhRbaopvDdag7 --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: opencode-agent[bot] <219766164+opencode-agent[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
1 participant
Bumps actions/download-artifact from 7.0.0 to 8.0.1.
Release notes
Sourced from actions/download-artifact's releases.
Commits
3e5f45bAdd regression tests for CJK characters (#471)e6d03f6Add a regression test for artifact name + content-type mismatches (#472)70fc10cMerge pull request #461 from actions/danwkennedy/digest-mismatch-behaviorf258da9Add change docsccc058eFix linting issuesbd7976bAdd a setting to specify what to do on hash mismatch and default it toerrorac21fcfMerge pull request #460 from actions/danwkennedy/download-no-unzip15999bfAdd note about package bumps974686eBump the version tov8and add release notesfbe48b1Update test names to make it clearer what they do