docs: update renamed repo references in AGENTS.md - #210
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 29 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Comment |
Folds the remaining ecosystem-name correction into this sweep so a single PR owns AGENTS.md per repo. keyverse (was cwl-idp) is the central passwordless IdP; feelanet-adfs is the employer ADFS SSO integration library it federates, per .github/docs/CWL-MASTER-CONTEXT.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
73c59bd09758913dc0927f158bac58d60a9d539d. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- R CMD check/check: FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/aFIPC/actions/runs/30917143965/job/92018036835)
- check check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/aFIPC/actions/runs/30917143965/job/92018036835)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: AGENTS.md"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: AGENTS.md"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed. Findings1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
Failed checks:
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: AGENTS.md"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: AGENTS.md"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
Docs-only sweep: AGENTS.md ecosystem/sibling-component lists still referenced pre-rename repo names. Per
ContextualWisdomLab/.githubdocs/CWL-MASTER-CONTEXT.md, the renames are:cwl-idp→keyversewaf-ids-ai-soc→wardnetcwl-editor→inkspanThis PR updates the stale name(s) in AGENTS.md only. No code changes.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code