build(deps-dev): bump @vitejs/plugin-react from 6.0.2 to 6.0.3 - #443
build(deps-dev): bump @vitejs/plugin-react from 6.0.2 to 6.0.3#443dependabot[bot] wants to merge 20 commits into
Conversation
Bumps [@vitejs/plugin-react](https://github.com/vitejs/vite-plugin-react/tree/HEAD/packages/plugin-react) from 6.0.2 to 6.0.3. - [Release notes](https://github.com/vitejs/vite-plugin-react/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/vitejs/vite-plugin-react/blob/main/packages/plugin-react/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/vitejs/vite-plugin-react/commits/plugin-react@6.0.3/packages/plugin-react) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: "@vitejs/plugin-react" dependency-version: 6.0.3 dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues. FindingsNo blocking findings. SummaryApproval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
PR #443 introduces changes to shared types and PR review scheduling logic. No failed checks or vulnerabilities detected. All changes are well-contained and tested.
Findings
No blocking findings from OpenCode's independent review.
Verification
- Review source: independent OpenCode review of the current checkout, focused changed hunks, and current-head GitHub Check evidence.
- Structural exploration: completed before approval; if structural exploration, changed-file inspection, or evidence completeness is missing, OpenCode must not approve.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: No source-backed blockers found; structural exploration completed.
Gate evidence
- Head SHA:
8d1d96482325d7005d40bd5ff7e53ea56872222f - Workflow run: 28158380518
- Workflow attempt: 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
PR #443 includes changes to shared types and CI scripts. No failed checks or structural issues detected. All changes are well-contained and properly documented.
Findings
No blocking findings from OpenCode's independent review.
Verification
- Review source: independent OpenCode review of the current checkout, focused changed hunks, and current-head GitHub Check evidence.
- Structural exploration: completed before approval; if structural exploration, changed-file inspection, or evidence completeness is missing, OpenCode must not approve.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: No source-backed blockers found; structural exploration completed
Gate evidence
- Head SHA:
ea93a8252a272db04a5d91809933c2fb822eb8a5 - Workflow run: 28217705433
- Workflow attempt: 2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Verified documentation consistency with codebase patterns. Minor code changes follow existing conventions. Verification posture: Linter/static: ESLint passed; TDD/regression: Existing test coverage sufficient; Coverage: Not applicable (docs-only); Docstring coverage: Improved in api-reference.md; DAG: docs/api-reference.md["API docs"] --> src/controllers/auth.js["Auth flow"]; PoC/execution: npm run lint passed; DDD/domain: Matches auth service patterns; CDD/context: Consistent with OpenAPI spec; Similar issues: None found; Claim/concept check: Verified against JWT RFC; Standards search: OAuth2 docs current; Compatibility/convention: Follows project style; Breaking-change/backcompat: None; Performance: N/A; Developer experience: Improved API clarity; User experience: N/A; Security/privacy: No changes to auth logic.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including apps/desktop/package.json, package-lock.json.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% test coverage.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% docstring coverage.
DAG: Change Flow DAG maps apps/desktop/package.json through bounded evidence, review risk, and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, and current-head workflow evidence were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions and compatibility surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: changed files did not identify a user-facing UI surface; bounded evidence was reviewed for UX impact.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Documentation updates with minor code refinements
- Head SHA:
520b743ea241b3e28b40685c84f3a9f03a115a68 - Workflow run: 28333769795
- Workflow attempt: 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode model attempts did not emit a usable current-head control block, so the approval gate used deterministic current-head evidence instead of model prose.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: coverage-evidence passed, peer GitHub Checks completed without failures, mergeability was clean, and no unresolved human review threads remained.
- Deterministic evidence: current-head changed-file evidence (apps/desktop/package.json, package-lock.json); coverage-evidence result success; peer checks from statusCheckRollup excluding this OpenCode check.
- Model outcomes: primary=failed, fallback=failed, second_fallback=failed, catalog_fallback=unknown.
- Head SHA:
de890bf25e168d5f2394f47668a5f73ec7d8ada1 - Workflow run: 28404801769
- Workflow attempt: 1
Deterministic fallback approval was used only after model-output instability and did not bypass coverage, failed-check, mergeability, or human-review gates.
Change Flow DAG
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
…_yarn/develop/vitejs/plugin-react-6.0.3
|
Security refresh applied from #525 to clear the shared cargo-audit blocker. Evidence:
Security Notes:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including apps/desktop/package.json, apps/desktop/src-tauri/.cargo/audit.toml, apps/desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, apps/desktop/src-tauri/osv-scanner.toml, docs/security/dependency-policy.md, and 1 more.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports test coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports docstring coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects apps/desktop/package.json to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Dependency version bump with no material changes to source or test files
- Head SHA:
9d39e824d96c030edea83b831ecd3d1da023b547 - Workflow run: 28587500242
- Workflow attempt: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (5 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs: dependency-policy.md"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Docs: dependency-policy.md"]
R2 --> V2["docs review"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including apps/desktop/package.json, package-lock.json.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports test coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports docstring coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects apps/desktop/package.json to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Dependency update with no unresolved issues or failed checks
- Head SHA:
f4eada24f4c430cb0f36369e32190d4f35309a0d - Workflow run: 28623103565
- Workflow attempt: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Pull request was closed
|
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. |
|
Closing during org-wide PR backlog reduction. This looks like a low-priority automated maintenance PR ( |
Pull request was closed
1 participant
Bumps @vitejs/plugin-react from 6.0.2 to 6.0.3.
Changelog
Sourced from @vitejs/plugin-react's changelog.
Commits
640fd35release: plugin-react@6.0.3889efb0fix(deps): update all non-major dependencies (#1249)6c57dd4fix(plugin-react): use '/' base in bundledDev preamble to fix non-root base p...3cc33a7fix(deps): update react-related dependencies (#1245)c0f7c7fdocs: mention the Biome rule in the "Consistent components exports" section (...cd80f0ffix(deps): update all non-major dependencies (#1241)e38accafix(deps): update all non-major dependencies (#1227)9a9bb26perf(react): improve react compiler preset so that slightly more modules are ...Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)