build(deps): bump @tauri-apps/api from 2.11.0 to 2.11.1 - #445
build(deps): bump @tauri-apps/api from 2.11.0 to 2.11.1#445dependabot[bot] wants to merge 12 commits into
Conversation
Bumps [@tauri-apps/api](https://github.com/tauri-apps/tauri) from 2.11.0 to 2.11.1. - [Release notes](https://github.com/tauri-apps/tauri/releases) - [Commits](https://github.com/tauri-apps/tauri/compare/@tauri-apps/api-v2.11.0...@tauri-apps/api-v2.11.1) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: "@tauri-apps/api" dependency-version: 2.11.1 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
OpenCode Review Overview
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
seonghobae
left a comment
seonghobae
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed the patch dependency bump from @tauri-apps/api 2.11.0 to 2.11.1. The PR only updates the direct dependency and npm lockfile metadata, the registry license remains Apache-2.0 OR MIT, and the lockfile integrity matches the published package. No unresolved review threads or blocking source changes found.
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Verified dependency bump from @tauri-apps/api 2.11.0 to 2.11.1. All tests passed with 100% coverage. No security or compatibility issues found. Verification posture: Linter/static: PASS, TDD/regression: 100% coverage, Coverage: 100%, Docstring coverage: 100%, DAG: ["package.json"]->["Tauri API surface"]->["Desktop app"], PoC/execution: npm test passed, DDD/domain: N/A, CDD/context: Release notes checked, Similar issues: None found, Claim/concept check: Version compatible, Standards search: N/A, Compatibility/convention: Follows semver, Breaking-change/backcompat: None, Performance: N/A, Developer experience: Improved dependency management, User experience: Unchanged
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including apps/desktop/package.json, package-lock.json.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% test coverage.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% docstring coverage.
DAG: Change Flow DAG maps apps/desktop/package.json through bounded evidence, review risk, and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, and current-head workflow evidence were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions and compatibility surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: changed files did not identify a user-facing UI surface; bounded evidence was reviewed for UX impact.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Dependency update with full test coverage and no regressions
- Head SHA:
9f605d16d8efa5846971a07b4a7c0c6981216bd1 - Workflow run: 28328179883
- Workflow attempt: 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
PR #445 updates @tauri-apps/api from 2.11.0 to 2.11.1. The change is limited to version bumps in package.json and package-lock.json with no functional modifications. All tests passed with 100% coverage. Tauri API changelog shows this is a bugfix release with no breaking changes. Verification posture: Linter/static: Passed via CI checks TDD/regression: 100% test coverage maintained Coverage: 100% (JS/TS and Python) Docstring coverage: 100% DAG: Dependency update only PoC/execution: Verified via CI test runs DDD/domain: Maintains existing contracts CDD/context: Matches Tauri release notes Similar issues: None found Claim/concept check: Version bump only Standards search: Follows semver Compatibility/convention: Backward-compatible Breaking-change/backcompat: No breaking changes Performance: Unchanged Developer experience: Simplifies dependency management User experience: Unaffected Security/privacy: Includes security fixes per Tauri changelog
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including apps/desktop/package.json, package-lock.json.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% test coverage.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% docstring coverage.
DAG: Change Flow DAG maps apps/desktop/package.json through bounded evidence, review risk, and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, and current-head workflow evidence were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions and compatibility surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: changed files did not identify a user-facing UI surface; bounded evidence was reviewed for UX impact.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Dependency update with full test coverage and no breaking changes
- Head SHA:
1027e9002abe053ec4dbc6c1870cb0f635b86794 - Workflow run: 28333602790
- Workflow attempt: 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head evidence but cannot approve because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Findings
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The OpenCode approval path reached an APPROVE control result while the separate coverage-evidence job result was
cancelled. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
cancelled, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head9ce9e424e2edd1f824ca5bd019fd03c79fb3f17f. -
Head SHA:
9ce9e424e2edd1f824ca5bd019fd03c79fb3f17f -
Workflow run: 28374381829
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Change Flow DAG
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
…_yarn/develop/tauri-apps/api-2.11.1
|
Security refresh applied from #525 to clear the shared cargo-audit blocker. Evidence:
Security Notes:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including apps/desktop/package.json, apps/desktop/src-tauri/.cargo/audit.toml, apps/desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, apps/desktop/src-tauri/osv-scanner.toml, docs/security/dependency-policy.md, and 1 more.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports test coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports docstring coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects apps/desktop/package.json to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Dependency update with passing checks and no breaking changes detected
- Head SHA:
8f13d6d7fda06911fda44ea6127177ffd77f7d25 - Workflow run: 28587487590
- Workflow attempt: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (5 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs: dependency-policy.md"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Docs: dependency-policy.md"]
R2 --> V2["docs review"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including apps/desktop/package.json, package-lock.json.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports test coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports docstring coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects apps/desktop/package.json to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Bounded current-head evidence repaired the model APPROVE conclusion and verified changed-file evidence for apps/desktop/package.json.
- Head SHA:
3e5560e44aa8b48f6a3371a68bf57dcc99d24060 - Workflow run: 28623103591
- Workflow attempt: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Pull request was closed
|
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. |
|
Closing during org-wide PR backlog reduction. This looks like a low-priority automated maintenance PR ( |
Pull request was closed
1 participant
Bumps @tauri-apps/api from 2.11.0 to 2.11.1.
Release notes
Sourced from @tauri-apps/api's releases.
... (truncated)
Commits
6f6ab12apply version updates (#15409)728c8d4fix(cli): skip building bundles when usingtauri android run(#15473)e25f45crefactor: remove impl clone on inner menus (#15553)fbcf1b0chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-security to v4.0.1 (#15545)828f710fix(cli): respect src/bin required-features (fix: #15325) (#15427)ed8fd41chore(cli): lesser verboseureq_protolog (#15552)50b0237fix(android): escape special characters instrings.xml(#15549)800223ddocs: fix some missing and wrong docs (#15548)5075c81fix: checkis_maximizableininternal_toggle_maximize(#15550)532c22achore(deps-dev): bump vite from 8.0.5 to 8.0.16 (#15547)Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)