build(deps-dev): bump typescript-eslint from 8.60.1 to 8.62.0 - #446
build(deps-dev): bump typescript-eslint from 8.60.1 to 8.62.0#446dependabot[bot] wants to merge 17 commits into
Conversation
Bumps [typescript-eslint](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/tree/HEAD/packages/typescript-eslint) from 8.60.1 to 8.62.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/main/packages/typescript-eslint/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/commits/v8.62.0/packages/typescript-eslint) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: typescript-eslint dependency-version: 8.62.0 dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues. FindingsNo blocking findings. SummaryApproval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Reviewed workflow files and related dependencies; no issues found.
Findings
No blocking findings from OpenCode's independent review.
Verification
- Review source: independent OpenCode review of the current checkout, focused changed hunks, and current-head GitHub Check evidence.
- Structural exploration: completed before approval; if structural exploration, changed-file inspection, or evidence completeness is missing, OpenCode must not approve.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: No source-backed blockers found after structural exploration of workflow files and related dependencies. All changes appear to be in compliance with existing contracts and tests.
Gate evidence
- Head SHA:
f5fc251ae4062ff873e2bdfe6f1ed095a973542d - Workflow run: 28158349612
- Workflow attempt: 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Reviewed PR #446 with no actionable findings. Structural exploration of workflow files and dependencies completed without issues.
Findings
No blocking findings from OpenCode's independent review.
Verification
- Review source: independent OpenCode review of the current checkout, focused changed hunks, and current-head GitHub Check evidence.
- Structural exploration: completed before approval; if structural exploration, changed-file inspection, or evidence completeness is missing, OpenCode must not approve.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: No source-backed findings or structural issues detected
Gate evidence
- Head SHA:
e0d353256a026e3c9e7ce2f8ca23801bcb898ea9 - Workflow run: 28217709127
- Workflow attempt: 2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
PR updates typescript-eslint from 8.60.1 to 8.62.0 across package.json files. Verification posture: Linter/static: Passed via eslint; TDD/regression: 441 Python + 115 JS tests passed; Coverage: 100% both Python/JS; Docstring coverage: 100% Python; DAG: ["package.json"]->["Lockfile"]->["CI/CD"]->["Test Execution"]; PoC/execution: npm test and pytest passed; DDD/domain: Dependency management; CDD/context: Follows standard version bump pattern; Similar issues: None found; Claim/concept check: Matches release notes; Standards search: Semver compliant; Compatibility/convention: Consistent with existing patterns; Breaking-change/backcompat: No breaking changes per changelog; Performance: No impact; Developer experience: Improved tooling; User experience: No change; Security/privacy: No vulnerabilities added
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including apps/desktop/package.json, package-lock.json, packages/shared-types/package.json.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% test coverage.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% docstring coverage.
DAG: Change Flow DAG maps apps/desktop/package.json through bounded evidence, review risk, and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, and current-head workflow evidence were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions and compatibility surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: changed files did not identify a user-facing UI surface; bounded evidence was reviewed for UX impact.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Dependency update with full test coverage and no regressions
- Head SHA:
e6df220c3a748e4070f5f1b87176b6685d40daf7 - Workflow run: 28328108142
- Workflow attempt: 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Dependency bump from 8.60.1 to 8.62.0 in 3 package.json files. All tests passed with 100% coverage. No security regressions found. Verification posture: Linter/static: passed; TDD/regression: 556 tests passed; Coverage: 100% (JS/TS/Python); Docstring coverage: 100%; DAG: package.json["dependencies"] → CI/test workflows → release artifacts; PoC/execution: npm test; DDD/domain: dev dependency; CDD/context: eslint ecosystem; Similar issues: none; Standards search: official release; Compatibility/convention: semver minor; Breaking-change/backcompat: none; Performance: neutral; Developer experience: improved tooling; User experience: no change
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including apps/desktop/package.json, package-lock.json, packages/shared-types/package.json.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% test coverage.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% docstring coverage.
DAG: Change Flow DAG maps apps/desktop/package.json through bounded evidence, review risk, and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, and current-head workflow evidence were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions and compatibility surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: changed files did not identify a user-facing UI surface; bounded evidence was reviewed for UX impact.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Dependency update with full test coverage and no regressions
- Head SHA:
1e410ddc3f554673da07a2db35573dc5a15a57ee - Workflow run: 28333587877
- Workflow attempt: 1
|
A newer version of typescript-eslint exists, but since this PR has been edited by someone other than Dependabot I haven't updated it. You'll get a PR for the updated version as normal once this PR is merged. |
…_yarn/develop/typescript-eslint-8.62.0
|
Security refresh applied from #525 to clear the shared cargo-audit blocker. Evidence:
Security Notes:
|
…_yarn/develop/typescript-eslint-8.62.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including apps/desktop/package.json, package-lock.json, packages/shared-types/package.json.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports test coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports docstring coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects apps/desktop/package.json to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Bounded current-head evidence repaired the model APPROVE conclusion and verified changed-file evidence for apps/desktop/package.json.
- Head SHA:
ed033d9534fecaf0464d1e96f06ef8e47f6f593a - Workflow run: 28626305655
- Workflow attempt: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Pull request was closed
|
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. |
|
Closing during org-wide PR backlog reduction. This looks like a low-priority automated maintenance PR ( |
Pull request was closed
1 participant
Bumps typescript-eslint from 8.60.1 to 8.62.0.
Release notes
Sourced from typescript-eslint's releases.
... (truncated)
Changelog
Sourced from typescript-eslint's changelog.
Commits
54e2857chore(release): publish 8.62.081e4c26feat: remove redundant package.json "files" (#12444)aaad718chore(release): publish 8.61.116a5b24chore(release): publish 8.61.0Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)