build(deps-dev): bump jsdom from 29.1.1 to 30.0.1

[dependabot]

Bumps jsdom from 29.1.1 to 30.0.1.

Release notes

Sourced from jsdom's releases.

v30.0.1

• Fixed getComputedStyle() with calc() and other functions throwing an exception, which regressed in v30.0.0. (@​asamuzaK)
• Sped up up range operations on large documents (@​leonidaz)

v30.0.0

Breaking changes:

• Node.js minimum version raised to ^22.22.2 || ^24.15.0 || >=26.0.0.

Other changes:

• Added CSS.escape() and CSS.supports() functions. (@​asamuzaK)
• Added 'background-position-x' and 'background-position-y' CSS properties. (@​olagokemills)
• Fixed getComputedStyle() to convert length values into pixels. (@​asamuzaK)
• Fixed CSS function serialization, e.g., in the return value of getPropertyValue(). (@​asamuzaK)
• Fixed the type of error thrown by document.evaluate() (@​dokson)

Commits

• 6584485 30.0.1
• 0c51df6 Update dependencies and dev dependencies
• 32adb34 Bump @​asamuzakjp/dom-selector
• 70f014a Speed up range operations on large documents
• 250d7ee Partially fix getComputedStyle with calc()
• 20a01fc 30.0.0
• 8c8e583 Precompute WPT expectation matches
• f32245c Bump Node.js floor and dependencies
• 03ef23b Add background-position longhands
• ded056f Test CSS.escape() with numeric IDs
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@dependabot[bot], you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 59 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 3fb4b051-3bd7-4828-a404-f26fca3559e4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between acdbea6 and 1d9c491.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• apps/desktop/package.json

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 1d9c4917114b33a030ab34d05d7d4b3a55a7c101.

• Head SHA: 1d9c4917114b33a030ab34d05d7d4b3a55a7c101

• Workflow run: 31061696657

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 1d9c4917114b33a030ab34d05d7d4b3a55a7c101
• Workflow run: 31061696657
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 1d9c4917114b33a030ab34d05d7d4b3a55a7c101.

• Head SHA: 1d9c4917114b33a030ab34d05d7d4b3a55a7c101

• Workflow run: 31061696657

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

@coderabbitai review
@cwl-noema-review
@opencode-agent

Review the exact live head only. Verify jsdom 30.0.1's Node floor is satisfied by every local and CI runtime, DOM/CSS behavior changes do not invalidate existing accessibility or sanitizer assumptions, lockfile resolution is coherent, and lint, strict typecheck, complete tests/coverage, builds, audit, and security gates pass. Review only; do not update the branch, merge, release, or alter protections.

[coderabbitai]

Rate Limit Exceeded

@seonghobae have exceeded the limit for the number of chat messages per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 8 seconds before sending another message.