build(deps-dev): bump tailwindcss from 4.3.2 to 4.3.3

[dependabot]

Bumps tailwindcss from 4.3.2 to 4.3.3.

Release notes

Sourced from tailwindcss's releases.

v4.3.3

Fixed

• Support --watch --poll[=ms] in @tailwindcss/cli when filesystem events are unreliable or unavailable (#20297)
• Canonicalization: match arbitrary hex colors against theme colors case-insensitively (e.g. bg-[#fff] and bg-[#FFF] → bg-white) (#20298)
• Prevent Preflight from overriding Firefox's native iframe:focus-visible outline styles (#20292)
• Ensure theme('colors.foo') in JS plugins resolves correctly when both --color-foo and --color-foo-bar exist (#20299)
• Ensure fractional opacity modifiers work with named shadow sizes like shadow-sm/12.5, text-shadow-sm/12.5, drop-shadow-sm/12.5, and inset-shadow-sm/12.5 (#20302)
• Parse selectors like [data-foo]div as two selectors instead of one (#20303)
• Ensure @tailwindcss/postcss rebuilds when a preprocessor like Sass changes the input CSS without changing the input file on disk (#20310)
• Ensure CSS nesting is handled even when Lightning CSS isn't run, such as in @tailwindcss/browser and Tailwind Play (#20124)
• Prevent achromatic theme colors from shifting hue when mixed in polar color spaces like oklch (#20314)
• Ensure --spacing(0) is optimized to 0px instead of 0 so it remains a <length> when used in calc(…) (#20319)
• Load @parcel/watcher only when needed in @tailwindcss/cli --watch mode, so one-off builds and --watch --poll work when @parcel/watcher can't be loaded (#20325)
• Use explicit platform fonts instead of system-ui and ui-sans-serif so CJK text respects the page's lang attribute on Windows (#20318)
• Prevent @tailwindcss/upgrade from rewriting ignored files when run from a subdirectory (#20329)
• Ensure earlier @source rules pointing to nested files are scanned when later @source rules point to files in parent folders (#20335)
• Prevent @tailwindcss/vite from triggering full page reloads when scanned files are processed by Vite but haven't been loaded as modules yet (#20336)

Changelog

Sourced from tailwindcss's changelog.

[4.3.3] - 2026-07-16

Fixed

• Support --watch --poll[=ms] in @tailwindcss/cli when filesystem events are unreliable or unavailable (#20297)
• Canonicalization: match arbitrary hex colors against theme colors case-insensitively (e.g. bg-[#fff] and bg-[#FFF] → bg-white) (#20298)
• Prevent Preflight from overriding Firefox's native iframe:focus-visible outline styles (#20292)
• Ensure theme('colors.foo') in JS plugins resolves correctly when both --color-foo and --color-foo-bar exist (#20299)
• Ensure fractional opacity modifiers work with named shadow sizes like shadow-sm/12.5, text-shadow-sm/12.5, drop-shadow-sm/12.5, and inset-shadow-sm/12.5 (#20302)
• Parse selectors like [data-foo]div as two selectors instead of one (#20303)
• Ensure @tailwindcss/postcss rebuilds when a preprocessor like Sass changes the input CSS without changing the input file on disk (#20310)
• Ensure CSS nesting is handled even when Lightning CSS isn't run, such as in @tailwindcss/browser and Tailwind Play (#20124)
• Prevent achromatic theme colors from shifting hue when mixed in polar color spaces like oklch (#20314)
• Ensure --spacing(0) is optimized to 0px instead of 0 so it remains a <length> when used in calc(…) (#20319)
• Load @parcel/watcher only when needed in @tailwindcss/cli --watch mode, so one-off builds and --watch --poll work when @parcel/watcher can't be loaded (#20325)
• Use explicit platform fonts instead of system-ui and ui-sans-serif so CJK text respects the page's lang attribute on Windows (#20318)
• Prevent @tailwindcss/upgrade from rewriting ignored files when run from a subdirectory (#20329)
• Ensure earlier @source rules pointing to nested files are scanned when later @source rules point to files in parent folders (#20335)
• Prevent @tailwindcss/vite from triggering full page reloads when scanned files are processed by Vite but haven't been loaded as modules yet (#20336)

Commits

• c2b24dd 4.3.3 (#20334)
• e48c5e8 Fix weird character rendering on Windows with Japanese locale (#20318)
• 35a3e9c Always produce \<length> value when optimizing --spacing(0) (#20319)
• 4af47fb Fix hues in achromatic theme colors to be none (#20314)
• 5835691 Handle CSS nesting natively (#20124)
• 67c745e Fix bug in attribute selector parsing (#20303)
• 2683903 Support fractional opacity modifiers for named shadow sizes (#20302)
• 04588b1 Fix theme() in JS plugins returning unresolved object instead of DEFAULT valu...
• b53fa09 fix: exclude iframes from focus-visible auto outline in Preflight (#20292)
• ef79119 Bump dependencies (#20300)
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@dependabot[bot], you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 58 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d1d74412-60a7-49b5-8944-ad46f5f4edb5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between acdbea6 and 08ac29c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• apps/desktop/package.json

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 08ac29cba336698bff82d47c9612ac31e5a783d8.

• Head SHA: 08ac29cba336698bff82d47c9612ac31e5a783d8

• Workflow run: 31071480407

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 08ac29cba336698bff82d47c9612ac31e5a783d8
• Workflow run: 31071480407
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 08ac29cba336698bff82d47c9612ac31e5a783d8.

• Head SHA: 08ac29cba336698bff82d47c9612ac31e5a783d8

• Workflow run: 31071480407

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

@coderabbitai review
@cwl-noema-review
@opencode-agent

Review the exact live head only. Verify Tailwind CSS 4.3.3 is lockfile-consistent with @tailwindcss/vite, preserves generated styling and CJK typography behavior, does not alter design tokens unexpectedly, and passes lint, strict typecheck, complete tests/coverage, Storybook/production builds, audit, and security gates. Review only; do not update the branch, merge, release, or alter protections.

[coderabbitai]

Rate Limit Exceeded

@seonghobae have exceeded the limit for the number of chat messages per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 39 seconds before sending another message.