🎨 Palette: 아이콘 버튼 툴팁 및 접근성 개선

[seonghobae]

아이콘 버튼에 툴팁 추가 및 비활성화 상태 접근성 개선

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 4067463524385849260 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 43 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 26f49327-24ef-4e01-b1b5-12221e92a9fe

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between acdbea6 and ee2f2f4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreView.test.tsx
• apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreView.tsx
• apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.test.tsx
• apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.tsx

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

Closing as superseded by #731. #731 already contains the same focusable aria-disabled score/PDF control direction plus the missing product-grade safeguards: guarded activation, visible disabled styling, aria-describedby linkage to the active-project explanation, broader component/source contracts, and a bounded root-lock update. This branch also carries unrelated package-lock.json peer-flag drift, so merging it would duplicate and weaken the reviewed accessibility slice.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as superseded by #731. #731 already contains the same focusable aria-disabled score/PDF control direction plus the missing product-grade safeguards: guarded activation, visible disabled styling, aria-describedby linkage to the active-project explanation, broader component/source contracts, and a bounded root-lock update. This branch also carries unrelated package-lock.json peer-flag drift, so merging it would duplicate and weaken the reviewed accessibility slice.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by #731 and stopping work on this task.

[seonghobae]

@coderabbitai review
@cwl-noema-review
@opencode-agent

Please review the exact live head only. Verify every icon-only control has a stable accessible name and non-obscuring tooltip, disabled controls expose their unavailable state without becoming misleadingly interactive, keyboard/focus behavior remains correct, pointer-only affordances are avoided, and visual/behavioral regressions are covered. Require current typecheck, complete tests and configured coverage, production build, security gates, and zero unresolved actionable threads. Review only; do not update the branch, merge, release, or alter protections.

[coderabbitai]

@seonghobae I will review the exact live head of #774 only. I will not modify the branch, merge it, release it, or change repository protections.

⚠️ Action not completed

Review rate limited.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.